Tyre reviews Dunlop GrandTrek Ice 02. Page 1 396
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Excellent tires, the only issue is (subjective) noise, as loud as a helicopter on bare asphalt. They last for around 600-800 km of driving. They stick well to ice. Sometimes, they can get a bit stuck in a snow-covered groove (you know, the kind of groove that forms in deep snow) - you have to drive slowly and "hold the wheel." All the studs are still in place. I'm satisfied.
- Vehicle:
- Honda CR-V
- Size:
- 215/65 R16 102T XL
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Йошкар-Ола
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I think these tires are great. They do make some noise, of course, being studded, but only on bare asphalt and not too critical, I'd say they're very soft and don't cause any discomfort. I drive fast, but carefully, 40% in the city, 60% in Moscow Region, accelerate quickly without wheelspin, and brake confidently too. I drove on the dacha in deep snow, just in case - they grip wonderfully (4x4). On packed
- Vehicle:
- Ford Explorer
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
The best choice in this price range, considering the tires were a 275/40 R20 and 315/35 R20 Continental SportContact 6. Before them, I had a set of Yokohama tires, but after changing to these, the car feels like a completely different vehicle. The only noticeable minus is the noise at speeds over 80 km/h after 20,000 km. I can say that the noise has significantly decreased, possibly the tread has been worn down and the
- Vehicle:
- BMW X5 (E53)
- Size:
- 315/35 R20 110T XL
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've been eyeing these tires for a long time and finally bought them. At first, I was a bit disappointed by their noise and how they performed on wet asphalt. After wearing them off for a thousand klicks, the noise decreased, and I got used to them, plus it helped that I drove a bit more carefully). For comparison, I also rode on an Hak7, and the only difference was the noise level, but in terms of behavior on city roads, they were the
- Vehicle:
- Jeep Grand Cherokee
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
A great value for money, I recommend letting it wear in for 500-1000 km, the noise will decrease. It holds snow and ice quite well, as long as you don't "point the nose". In general, I've covered 6000 km, and all the studs are still in place. Prior to this, I was running a Nokia 5, which was no better, especially at domestic prices compared to imports.
- Vehicle:
- Lexus RX350 3.5L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Hi, after the first winter the tires showed themselves in a positive way. Considering the weight of the car, the tires grip the road nicely, hard adhesion to the road surface when turning, doesn't float in the track.
In the 1500 km of use, one nail was lost, the rest are well seated.
Minus points:
- the tires make noise, but not critically
- not perfectly balanced (the tire fitters had to try really hard)In general, an optimal price
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Land Cruiser 200
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The first impressions were deceiving, it seemed no worse than the haki 7, but with the first snow and the appearance of ice, the tire showed itself in a negative light. It brakes poorly on ice, constantly triggering ABS. I was driving on a country road, the weather was warm, but by evening it got cold, and there was black ice, in a 90-degree turn at a speed of 30 km/h I did not get into it. As a result, I
- Vehicle:
- BMW X5 (F15)
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The tire meets all requirements. The price is acceptable, the manufacturer (R20 - Japan) uses high-quality materials and meets the assigned tasks. I haven't tested the tire to its full potential yet, but it has shown itself well for the first 1.5 thousand km. They say it's noisy, but honestly, I don't have anything to compare it to in this regard, but the tire's contact patch is quite large, so it makes a bit more noise. I also
- Vehicle:
- Infiniti QX70
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
So, I took 235/60 R17 106T XL, drove for 3 seasons (including intercity), satisfied. Comments here are quite adequate, I agree with many of them.
In the city, it's great, near clean asphalt you can hear the studs, but you can hear any tire. On the highway, it's noisy at speeds above 90. After running in, they become quieter.
They brake perfectly, however, on ice with- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Captiva
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought Dunlop with some trepidation as I had never taken them before. But I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the tire. The quality of the tire is no worse than Nokian Hakapeliitta 7, and I live in a harsh climate, the tire doesn't get hard even at -30°C. I would recommend this tire to everyone. I read reviews that this tire is noisy, but I don't know where they're getting that from or what they're
- Vehicle:
- BMW X5 (E70)
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability