Tyre reviews Dunlop Direzza DZ101 39

I bought the R17 225/50 (7500) for a pretty penny, but I expected more for the price. It does handle dry asphalt well, and it's decent in terms of cornering as well – I can push the speed quite a bit on turns, which is nice. It also brakes well, and a couple of times it saved me. However, as soon as the dry asphalt ends, everything falls apart. It didn't completely fail me, but I wouldn't take

A very good tire in terms of price to quality ratio.

I drive a turbocharged Subaru Forester. It's clear that with such an engine, I sometimes like to press the gas pedal and make the tires squeal in the turns. The Forester's native tire, Yokohama Geolander, is very mediocre, clearly not designed for such a powerful and heavy vehicle. But the worst thing for me is that it's absolutely not suited for bad roads. In 1.

I bought the tire, 225/50/R17, with 40% wear. I drove on it for 10,000 km with the front-wheel drive and the tread depth is ~4.2-4.4 mm. My driving style is mostly calm and sometimes sporty but not aggressive. It holds the road perfectly: on dry and on wet asphalt I barely noticed a difference; it behaves properly in the rain, I haven't noticed any aquaplaning (although I didn

Run flat tires were KUMHO... noisy and had thorns almost on every wheel... First impressions brake super strong as a rock... compared to factory tires ( Sonata 2011 ). Softness - 4 +... I can't say anything about snow as yet (no experience) ... I think it's a good alternative to factory wheels.

Tires - which are great. I swapped out my Direzza for the old one which was done in after 2 seasons. I drive a lot and I haven't noticed any wear (that's already 4 months). It's quiet, the side wall is great, there's no aquaplaning. Recommended.

Direzza DZ101 specifically 225/45 R17 is available in 3 variants. 1) Direzza DZ101 225/45 R17 90W (up to 600 kg, up to 270 km/h) 2) Direzza DZ101 225/45 R17 94W (up to 670 kg, up to 270 km/h) 3) Direzza DZ101 225/45 R17 94

I was expecting more! Disappointed ((. Bought new ones. After two seasons at 45,000 km, I almost wore down to the wear indicator at not very aggressive driving. Noisy. Although there are some pluses. Reinforced sidewalls protect the rims. Extremely grippy - immediately responds to steering input, which is again a minus. You can't relax on the highway. Always wants to go somewhere. The topic of snow and ice is separate. Definitely don't wait for the

215/45/R17. Excellent tire. Worth its money. Of course, there is some discomfort on bad roads, but it's all because of the small profile. That's why most tires will seem harder with this profile. Many people write that they are hard. On wet asphalt, the handling is already not great, but I wouldn't say it's bad. It's normal.

Good day everyone! I've been driving on these tires for a season already; the wear is minimal. The tires are generally good: the car handles the road normally, there have been no problems so far, knock on wood, it hasn't given me any trouble; on a wet road, it also seemed quite good: I drove in a heavy downpour once, calmly holding 100-110 km/h, the car didn't skid. Maybe the four-wheel drive also helps. It seems

Worst tires!

I drove on these tires last summer for half a year, my car is a Mazda 3 MPS. The only plus of these tires is absolute silence. As for handling, it's not even worth talking about, it can't withstand lateral loads, and in the rain, it aquaplanes instantly. At ADM Myachkovo, I spun out twice because of them))