Tyre reviews Dunlop Graspic DS2. Страница 2 188

Not bad

As most people can say, the price is really pleasing. I've driven on these tires for two seasons, 2006/2007. I drive my car every day and go everywhere, since I live in the suburbs, so I've driven in snow, ice, and so on (the Carpathians, etc.). What can I say, ice and snow are its element, dry asphalt is so-so, and in other respects, it's not very good for me

The car was purchased with a mileage of 17,000 km in 2008 with this tire. Now, in February 2024, replacement is required - not due to tread wear, but due to aging and the appearance of cracks on the sidewalls. It was never repaired at a tire shop - never punctured. Seasonal replacements were made every 5-6 months, depending on the weather, so the winter mileage accounted for about 40% of the total mileage - the car's operation was even and not dependent on the seasons.

Drove on 175/65 R14 from 2006 to 2014 for 7 seasons. Positive experiences only - both black ice, deep powdery snow, "mud", and the shoulder in spring. However, in the last two seasons I wasn't so sure, probably the tire's resource of 5 years was exceeded. In the city and on the highway up to 130 km/h, it behaves predictably. Black ice is also no problem. The tire is

I've been running these tyres for 4 years, both in the circular and touring modes, and winter and summer. It was not originally planned, but it happened. After running them in June, I noticed that there was no wear. The car handles the road very well. I'm completely satisfied with the tyres. The only downsides are that they don't like water at high speeds, and they do slightly wander on asphalt, but you quickly get used to this.

Ran for 6 seasons. Very pleased with the tyres. Small mileage. The tyre was very nice. The ride was smooth. Before each trip in winter, I tested the tyres on a free area and adjusted my driving accordingly.

Toyota Caldina 1.8 (closest car to Avensis)
The tire was on the car when I bought it in 2008. For 6 years running the tire has minimal wear, though the car is used every day.
The tire is not perfect, but a solid 4 out of 5. Performs well on snowy roads, good traction on ice. Strong sidewall.
For regions where snow doesn't stay all year, very

I'm extremely dissatisfied with this tire. It's a 225/45/17 and there's no sidewall support whatsoever. It's completely undrivable on wet roads. At 40 km/h, I hit a small pothole and it completely blew two of the tires. Prior to this, I was running on Bridgestone tires and they handled all the potholes without any issues.

It's gone through 5 winters, with normal wear, if not to say economical. On dry asphalt, do not accelerate over 100 km/h, slight oscillations occur, and noticeable dependence on road camber is observed. Overall, it's a very pleasant ride, soft even in severe frosts, almost silent (if that's possible), its favorite weather is light snow (or snow) at -5 to -10°C. On a snow-covered road (often encountered in Tver Obl

Installed for the 5th season (appears to be the last one as the indicator is close). Durable, relatively quiet, soft, and hold well on ice and snow. Satisfied on asphalt. They dig out of a snowbank fairly well (I turn off ESP). On fresh snow in a turn, they slide outwards, and with a reduction of gas pedal - deep slide. Sideslip and stability occur sharply. A good tire for city driving

The only worse tire than Rosava is the Rosava. It sinks into any snow. Even when parked, if it was a snowfall. Driving on a track is a catastrophe! Braking is bad everywhere. The A VS tires are constantly worn out. The only plus is its durability. It lasted for 3 seasons. I handed it over to the tire fitters to change to Bridgestone Blizzak WS60 and made the sign of the cross.