Tyre reviews Michelin X-Ice North 2. Страница 2 323

Summer 2015 bought a set 175/65R14 . Production year - 2014. Russia.

Finally I achieved my dream, I have Michelin. When the temperature dropped to 0 degrees, I put it on the car. I put it on the road with a speed of up to 80km/h - 1000km, then into action. Mostly asphalt, highway. Speeds up to 160km/h. A little bit of gravel and snow

Winter 2011/2012 mileage 15,000 km 175/65/R14
The first 2-3 thousand km was so noisy that I wanted to jump out of the car, then quieter, but all in different sounds.
Liked everything, lost not a single stud, although 80% of the mileage in Moscow.

The tires are good, but very noisy, at speeds above 40km/h the noise starts to increase. On asphalt, they don't behave very well, you need to be careful when braking, if there's a rut in the asphalt and a frozen puddle in it, the car won't stop, it will continue to slide. On snow and in slush, they perform at a 5+ level. They were balanced normally for a budget category tire.

I checked the brand when buying. The studs started coming off in the third season. Until then, they all held up. Rolled 4 seasons. At the end of 4th, the blisters burst on one and went with radial cracks, on two the cord came out.

I previously used these tires on a Chevrolet Aveo t300. At the time, I thought they were a great tire. Quiet, soft, and saved my skin more than once in tricky situations. So, when it was time to choose a winter tire for a different car, I bought another set of Mitas. Everything I mentioned remained on the same level except for the noise. The rumble is noticeable at speeds of 60-100, and it's quite loud. Could it be that

I replaced Nokian Hakkapeliitta. The only drawback is the noise level compared to Nokian. All the other characteristics are similar by subjective feelings. Usage: 20% of the time is Moscow city traffic, 80% of the time is Moscow region.

Spent winter on this tire. The drawbacks are quite loud, even at 37 mph, hence, no comfort in vehicles with poor interior sound insulation. However, it does its job perfectly well. The advantages are excellent side stability and resistance to skidding on the asphalt. A telling example is when my wife turned at 90 degrees on a highway outside the city at 50 mph in the turn, I thought we would crash, but the tire held, not even a little bit. I live

The tire itself is not bad. It holds the road well enough. At a speed of over 100 km/h, there is no feeling of aquaplaning. It is quite quiet. The loss of studs is negligible, about fifteen percent. The only downside is the soft sidewalls. On the highway, I hit a pothole with the right front wheel. The result was a sidewall cut.

Excellent tires, when operated in Arkhangelsk, showed themselves in the best way. Confidently both in snow and on ice and in deep snow. The tires are very soft, but the sidewall does not suffer at all, the season is not over yet, so far all the studs are in place. By the way, a regular round stud works no worse than the advertised multi-angled ones. Good luck to everyone!

Excellent tires!!! Replaced with the same ones. They handle the road perfectly, crawl through snowdrifts like on a summer road, noise level is standard. I recommend