Tyre reviews Michelin Energy E3A. Страница 2 640

The tire is just mediocre. I bought it for my first car, VAZ 2115, 14 radius, and the salesman on the market was very praising, so I fell for it. The result after three days of use is a bulge, a very weak sidewall on a budget tire, which barely withstands such potholes. But on this almost level surface, I got a bulge. So it's a comfortable tire, but it's very noisy, louder than a

People, I'm shocked by you, especially those who drive on it in January and criticize it, you're not normal!!! I had a 185/60*14 German-made tire on our Taz 2114, and I got caught once on radar at a speed of 158 km/h! I sold the car after two years with a half-worn-out tire (it had 45,000 km on it), a top-notch tire that's quiet, comfortable in moderation, and holds

stood from the factory. the tire is not very good, it was enough for 1 season, the front wheels are worn out, a bump appeared on the rear one, it wears out quickly, it's terrible, it lasted me only half a year, the car is Kia Ceed

I do not advise, it is only suitable for pensioners for trips to the dacha

Very good in tires. Not excellent in wet, but gives good confidence. Excellent tire wear! Now driving Continental Econtact CP, which is a hazardous tire on wet. Don't try!!! TRY DUNLOP SP10 OR Vredestein Hi-Trac

Very good tires for city driving and moderate driving. I drive aggressively, and still, the front tires lasted 38,000 kilometers and the rear tires 60,000 kilometers (VAZ 2115). I replaced the front tires with similar ones. The sidewalls are, of course, weak, and I got a puncture quite quickly, at 7,000 km. However, this did not affect the quality of the ride in any way. They handle well in the rain (up

They stood from the factory, I'm running the second season and for the next one I'll have to buy a new one. Amtelek doesn't wear out that way (threw it away after 80,000 km), and I've driven about 30,000 km on this one and that's it! There are 2 mm left. Aquaplaning - none! But on a wet road it's very good, and overall it's not bad tires, it's just

I bought Michelin Energy E-3A yesterday. I don't have any objective feelings yet, but the first subjective ones are that it somehow hums strangely. The hum is up to a speed of 60 km/h, and above that, it's quiet. The tire is soft enough, like any Michelin. I'm curious if this is its feature or if I just got a defective one. I bought it at the market. Those who have driven enough, share your impressions

I drove my Audi 80 1.8 on these tires since this spring, almost 30,000 km, both on dry and wet roads, and they handled very well, holding the track very firmly, it was very hard to make the wheels slip, they saved me several times from minor aquaplaning which starts after 100

I installed Energy E3A tires, previously had GY Ventura. Although it's written that Michelin is quiet, (http://www.autoreview.ru/new_site/year2004/n06/tyres/1.htm) - I disagree. It's noisy, especially on the highway above 80-90 (made in Germany). And the rear handles well in turns when accelerating above 100. This wasn't the case with the worn-out GY. This tire is for city driving,

I've driven on E3A all summer. The tires are excellent. There's no noise, as many people here say. It handles turns well. On a wet road, there was no hint of slipping or skidding. The braking is excellent. In general, with these tires, you feel confident in any weather. The car behaves the way you want it to. I recommend buying them. Although I don't claim to have the opinion that they are the best on the market.