Tyre reviews Continental ContiIceContact. Page 3 424
- Rate
I live in Moscow Oblast. I covered 2,000 km over the winter, mostly in the city (they clear the snow occasionally). I'm satisfied with the tires. They're quiet despite the studs, and the Yokohama 072 (which I had previously) is much louder. I agree with the stated properties. When driving on icy roads with snow mixed with a de-icer, you need to be more cautious at low temperatures. The braking distance is naturally longer on dry asphalt
- Vehicle:
- Honda CR-V 2,4L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Car owners don't buy winter tires "Continental ContiIceContact - a new product on the market. Universal tires for the harsh northern winter. Proven in Scandinavia" 215/60/17..... If you want safe normal driving - Don't buy, especially for the price of 9400 - 13700 rubles... they are not worth even half the money!
My story - 4 winters I drove on Continental ContiPremium Contact 2 (these tires
- Vehicle:
- Dodge Caliber 1,8L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
After 20 years of driving, I have tried out the most diverse studded tyres and I can vouch for my words: Conti is the best studded tyre I have ever driven on. Its handling and emergency braking on ice are beyond praise. It also performs well in both light and deep snow - very convenient if overnight your car is buried in the driveway. On the highway at speed, it doesn't steer to the sides - another plus. If I were to point out a minus,
- Vehicle:
- Audi TT 2,0L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
People, what’s going on? Continental can't just break down like that (blisters, cracks, rapid wear), it's an AXIOM. Almost 100% sure that such tires were bought from grey market sellers. I've been driving for the fourth season on tires bought from an official reseller. Never had any of the mentioned problems, and after three winters my ContiIceContact still has more than two-thirds of the studs. In contrast to all those who write nonsense about
- Vehicle:
- Lexus RX300 3,0L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
If your lives are more important than money, buy ContiIceContact tyres. I was hesitant to buy it last winter, but now I'm glad I splurged. It's been exactly a year since I almost got into a fatal accident and myself along with it. I tried to overtake on the left when I didn't notice the oncoming traffic. I slammed on the brakes and swerved back to my lane - my adrenaline kicked in and I discovered I had some extreme driving skills.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Rio 1,6L 2005-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Got tyres with previous owner, 20k of age
Condition is just fantastic. Missing 2 studs from 4 wheels. Handles snow perfectly, predictable braking and turning. A bit noisy, noticeable at 90 km/h, but you don’t drive that fast in Moscow anyway.
- Vehicle:
- Mazda 6 2,3L 2002-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Great.
175/65/14 went offroad two winters.
The operation was only in the city, there was a lot of snow, t to -35. During two winters, I lost only one stud, a Mischlan worker lost half of the studs in the first two months.
It hums in moderation, it's great in the snow, it brakes well.
If the price is not a principle - to buy it's a no-brainer- Vehicle:
- Mazda Demio 1,5L 1998-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I would like to leave a review about Continental ContiIceContact tire. I drove on it for about 9 winter seasons around 50,000 km on Pajero Sport. It's a great tire! Predictable handling on any road conditions, very good behavior on ice, minimal wear for the mileage. A bit of tread wear, but not much. Didn't notice any excessive noise. Before that, I had Continental - ContiWinterViking 2 on another car, and all
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Previously, I was driving on Hankooks, the tires were not great, they were afraid of slush. I decided to buy Continentals and I'm not regretting it. They hold the road perfectly, they also brake well. They're okay in the snow. I'm satisfied with the purchase.
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Almera
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good tire.
I like it more than the second one, even though the first one lost a lot of tread. I lost about 20% of the tread over 40000 km. That's why I marked it 4 stars.
Subjectively, in the Pradik, where the rumble is not too bad, they didn't rumble too much. The acoustic comfort was on a good level (or the snow was cleaned better?).
On ice,- Vehicle:
- Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability