Tyre reviews Continental ContiCrossContact UHP 287

I spent a long time deliberating between UHP and other Conti models, heavily swayed by negative reviews of the rapid wear and general vulnerability to external factors, but I took the plunge and so far I'm not regretting it. I'd like to highlight the excellent road grip, comfortable ride, and virtually no noise after the Bridgestone Dueller, at least not to a point that it's noticeable. They also performed flawlessly on moderate off-road terrain (my typical driving regime is

Car - LR F2 3.2.

Main area of operation - KhMAO.

This tire was on the car from the moment of purchase. After a run on the car 100 t. km. worn to the limits and the question arose of choice. I had no complaints about this tire, but I wanted something new. I connected to the Internet, tried to figure out ambiguous reviews, got frustrated with the futility of this event, and decided to buy

I've run 4000 km on these tires (Moscow-Sevastopol-Moscow) and I'm satisfied. They have good high-speed performance (at 170 km/h they hold the road perfectly), assured grip on a dry surface (haven't had a chance to test on a wet one), and a good noise level. I recommend.

I wrote a good review of this tire in 2013 when it was new. However, after 10-15,000 km, the opinion changed to the opposite. Initially, I started getting punctures on relatively new tires. When disassembled, it became clear that the sidewalls were very thin and even fragile sharp pebbles on the road, and self-tapping screws were a death sentence. The tread began to peel off in layers and crumble, as if there was a

I've been driving on these tires for a bit, but recently I heard on the radio about black ice and the related accidents. Still, I decided to go out - found several 10-meter-long patches of ice and, in the end, during braking on these patches at speeds of 40-50 km/h ABS didn't work even once, while the car braked like it was on dry asphalt. F**k, f**k, f**k. But I've calmed down

I'm very satisfied with the tyres!
The car is now much quieter and the noise level inside the vehicle has decreased noticeably.
I liked the water drainage. The car does not skid when driving on a puddle. The water quickly drains away through the grooves on the sides.
It drives beautifully both on good asphalt and on a dirt road, and even on a liquid mud.
Unfortunately, I've already changed my summer tyres to

I've already used the second set of these tires. Both cars are XC-90s, and both sets of tires were original equipment. The first set was from 2009 and the second from 2013. Both sets had been driven for no more than 40,000 km. Handling, speed characteristics, and all other qualities typical for summer tires were excellent. However, there are also some drawbacks, which are characteristic for purely summer tires. The first episode: handover, wet grass

I spent a long time choosing summer tires for my crossover and it seems I wasn't wrong. These tires are worth their money. At first, they seemed a bit too stiff, but after around 1000 km of break-in, everything fell into place. They grip the road perfectly, the noise level is minimal, and the handling is excellent. On wet asphalt, the car responds very well to the steering wheel. I went a couple of times into the countryside and drove on light dirt and grass

Everything is great, really like it. No more having to change tires twice a year and wasting time and money! Only one drawback to using them: the tires wear out faster since we use them in the summer and wouldn't have to change them otherwise! This fall we'll be looking to purchase this same model again.

UHP tires with an E rating: excellent handling and very quiet, but very weak sidewalls. I drove out of the garage at 5 km/h and on potholes I burst the sidewall. Didn't even notice anything, no jagged stones or pipes... nothing was on the road. Continental has a guarantee for such damage, but I'm not sure if it covers tires bought in a car salon :(