Tyre reviews Continental ContiEcoContact 3 855

Only positives. No negatives. From 2012, 165/70 R14 81T came from the factory. After 102,000 km, there were only 3 punctures. The only thing, due to its great softness, there is no rear end swing when puncturing the rear wheel. I highly recommend to everyone!!!

I decided to try Conti after running Hankook 4S, when the issue of fuel economy arose. It is much harder and more durable in terms of wear. Only ran in summer, didn't try in winter on summer tire (and didn't need to). Road holding is clear. On a wet road at 110 km/h, the car feels stable, the only sense of being "tugged along" is understandable when not on a dry surface. Fuel consumption significantly decreased. The price

Traveled around 70,000 km in 4 years, no cracks. The tread on the front tires worn down to the indicator, while the rear ones can still be used for another season. I never replaced any of the tires. I kept the pressure within 2.3 kg/cm. The tread is noisy - so I can hear the road surface. The highest aquaplaning resistance compared to its analogs. Overall, I'm satisfied with these tires.

The best value for money – they fully justify the investment. I am very satisfied. I had to drive not only on asphalt, but also on gravel roads and mountain stony roads. I hit the curb and the sides of potholes and the sidewalls are whole. Although compared to Bridgestone, the sidewall is obviously thinner and softer, but it is also more comfortable to drive. In the rain it confidently handles a wet road, of course, within reasonable limits. Bridgestone

Good tire!
I've been using it for the fifth season, it seems (I bought it in May 2007).
Work mode, garden, I've taken it on a long trip about 5 times (over 5,000 km a week).
This is my last season with the car (possibly one more trip around the city, no more than 80 km/h).
VAZ 2110

I bought a Corsa in 2008 and it came with these tyres straight from the factory. In general, it has served me faithfully for 4 seasons. Aquaplaning, braking on a wet road - a solid 10 out of 10. Doesn't like -5 degrees, immediately becomes brittle and the car becomes undrivable, city, countryside, dry weather - a solid 4! Does well in rallyes and sprints, though it does make a bit of a

A good tire, which came with the purchase of a new car, lasted for 4 seasons, with an average mileage of 15,000 per season. I drove it hard, both in wet and dry conditions. In the rain and on dry pavement, it was dead. It took on mud and dirt. In the end, I sold it off for 1,000 rubles per tire.

I've been driving with them for 3 years. The tire is normal, but the lateral surface is extremely weak. The tread is worn down a bit and it's easy to get a flat. A friend of mine had a similar experience, his tire blew out on the highway after a small puncture. The speed was relatively low. It's best to drive very carefully on tires like this.

It's definitely worth its money

The sidewall is soft, that's a fact - when driving aggressively, the tire gets deformed, but for comfortable driving, it's just right. I can't say for sure about the wear, but after 30,000 km of aggressive driving (wheelspin, locking), it has worn out considerably. It holds the road well on dry and wet surfaces. The resistance to aquaplaning is average. The braking distance can't be compared

It very tightly holds a road both on a dry and wet surface.
Did not hit the curb, did not check the side walls for strength.
I buy the third set already. They do not remove from production despite the release of a new model ContiEcoContact 5.
Certainly it is a very successful model from Continental for budget cars (110hp).