Tyre reviews Michelin Energy XM2. Page 2 341

My car is old and slow, very soft.
I move as a pensioner - from home to work and back, about 7 km a day.
Our roads are just great - perfect asphalt all over the city.
The tires turned out to be all defective - after 200 km the cord burst inside and they became oval and zigzag-shaped all over the protector.
The delivery was prompt, the store took part in the delivery, everything was politely and quickly

The tires were very nice in handling on both dry and wet asphalt. You shouldn't go on the wet grass if there's a slope, as the tire is only made for asphalt and will spin. On gravel at 100-110 km/h you will get close to skidding in turns. Overall, I am satisfied with the tires.

I have been using this tire for my first season, and I had chosen it after a long search, and I don't think I made a mistake. I will highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the tire.
Advantages:
- Price (the price is quite democratic, the difference with second-tier tires is not large);
- Aquaplaning resistance (on the highway in the rain, I go 100-110 km/h without any problems and complaints);<

I put on the softest tires you can imagine, the day I put them on I checked the brakes and they were perfect!!!!! From 120 to 0 on Leningradka, I'd brake too hard and I'd lock up, but I was in control the whole time. When I put them on, the installer was worried about the sidewalls being as thin as paper and getting cracks. Indeed, the sidewalls are soft, but I've driven 10,000 km now and

I bought, installed and won't complain. Before these, I had the Nokian Hakkapeliitta North, more or less the same as the Mileage. After that I understood that nothing better exists. The Nokian Hakkapeliitta North is a Finnish product, really saves fuel and isn't small change for my mileage. They lasted about 45,000 km, maybe not much but in terms of fuel it's still a saving. It's interesting that they didn't badly

I put this tire on yesterday. I can say this - the car rides very smoothly. It passes over potholes and pits with ease - at a rate of 5. On my old tire, I was literally having to wrestle the wheel to keep it under control in such situations. Now, it's just a tap and that's it. The handling is superb. It just dives into corners. There's no sign at all of the car being thrown off course. The driving style is

Zahit911 About MICHELIN ENERGY XM2 Tires I installed the front pair of Michelin XM2 in place of a nearly new Nokian Hakkapeliitta tire that was punctured on one of the front axle wheels, both sets being 185/65/14. After the change, the following differences were identified: The Michelin is quieter, it absorbs irregularities better, directional stability at high speeds is incomparably better, i.e., the maximum comfortable speed is

I bought the tire in 2015. I mainly drive in the city, the roads are acceptable. I don't drive aggressively. The tread wear over one and a half seasons is almost nonexistent. I have crashed into very deep potholes several times, due to the high profile of the tire 185/65 disk and tire, they remain intact and in good condition. Out of inexperience, I repeatedly scraped the curb - not a hint of a bulge. Extremely soft, it smooth

These tyres "survived" fire and metal tubes. Winter and summer tyres both are 5++. Too bad they're made in France. That's probably my only unpatriotic act. The car doesn’t matter, it's a present.

Drivers, don't worry, the tire is great! (Better than the others, for sure!) I put it on and the car took off, 140 and I want to add even more. During balancing, the guy (mechanic) scratched his head and said, I don't need any weights, not even two, taken from my own discs. I didn't believe it, so I spun it on the machine and it's true, the imbalance is minimal. Mine is made in