Tyre reviews Michelin Energy Saver. Страница 5 1900

  • Michelin Energy Saver
    Michelin Energy Saver

Статистика отзывов на шины Michelin Energy Saver

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Michelin Energy Saver пользователями сайта: 4.72784 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Michelin Energy Saver: 1900 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 361
  • Место в рейтинге (летние): 212
Control on a dry road
Braking on dry roads
Steering in the wet
Braking on wet roads
Control on dirt
Drive comfort
Internal noise
Quiet in motion
Rate
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price/performance
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Michelin Energy Saver по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
2%
2
3%
3
6%
4
40%
5
49%
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Buy with confidence if comfort is not the last thing in a car for you!

    After Fulda Carat Progresso (which after 50,000 miles started beating on the steering wheel, but was "almost" balanced, it's unclear what happened to it in one word) I noticed:

  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    3.5

    The right tire for good roads
    Fuel savings due to hard tire. Noise is very dependent on the quality of the coating, where the coating has not an ideally even surface, there you will hear every pebble and every crack in the asphalt. Very controversial tire. On wet and dry road, braking is good. Handling is sharp and correct.
    Pros: to taste
    Cons: critically dependent on road quality

    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control on dirt
    Quiet in motion
    Rate
    Wearability
    Price/performance
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    4

    Awesome!!!

    I'm satisfied! I chose between Nokian, Michelin and Continental for a long time! The choice is obvious and I'm happy so far. I already notice a difference compared to Continental - no joint noise, and it's quite comfortable to drive on bad roads. The only drawback is the handling, but overall it's great, considering the relatively low price. For an aggressive driving style, I'd recommend Goodyear Excellence - it's been tested by time and

    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control on dirt
    Quiet in motion
    Rate
    Wearability
    Price/performance
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    3.5

    Good tires, but expensive!

    I bought a used car (Nissan Almera N16) with Michelin Pilot Primacy 205/60 R15 tires, which were old (2001). So, I decided to buy new ones. After a long selection process based on tests and reviews, I chose between Continental PremiumContact 2, Nokian Hakkapeliitta H, and Michelin Energy Saver. I opted for Michelin (195/60 R15)

    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control on dirt
    Quiet in motion
    Rate
    Wearability
    Price/performance
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    4.6

    Excellent tires, they came from the factory, bought a spare wheel after a puncture. Quiet, soft, holds the road at any speed, no complaints in the rain

    Vehicle:
    Peugeot 408
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4.6

    I'm buying my 3rd set, everything suits me. It would be ideal if the cost were a bit lower. A question to the survey organizers, how can I rate handling on ice if I'm sharing my impressions of summer tires?

    Vehicle:
    Citroen C4
    Size:
    215/55 R16 93V
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    City:
    Волжский
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    4.6

    Good rubber, satisfied.

    Vehicle:
    Mitsubishi Lancer
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    4.8

    Good tire at a good price. Holds up well. I would recommend to everyone.

    Vehicle:
    Toyota Corolla Verso
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    4.9

    They all write and I decided to chime in. Not to write about Michelin, let me tell you. The tire lasts six seasons and if it wasn't for our roads, it would last a couple more seasons. Michelin is great for the price – it handles the road well and is durable. I don't know how others feel, but for me it's worth the money. I ordered a new set and I'm hoping for another six seasons of good driving. He who is thr

    Vehicle:
    Ford Focus
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    4.1

    Good, soft, quiet. No complaints about it.

    Vehicle:
    Volkswagen Passat
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability