Tyre reviews Michelin Energy Saver. Страница 2 1900

Michelin Energy Saver 195/60 R16 (summer) tires, which were installed on the car when I bought it from a dealership, have completed two seasons (38000 km) and left a rather unpleasant impression. They are quite noisy and don't hold the road well. It's not a Mercedes, but a Volga on such tires. I have something to compare them to, so it's a definite no, I won't be buying them again.

Ran around 70 laps on the "Saver" - more than half of the total track distance. In this time I changed two cars, re-tired the tires. Both Camrys. I changed tires because over time they started to make a dreadful noise and I simply got bored with it, and the tread was still alive. Still, it didn't lose its operational qualities. It gripped the road perfectly, excellent braking performance in emergency situations. I felt fully secure in any situation on

I've already clocked over 180,000 km on this "Misha" (third set on third car). It was Kumho Ecsta, Bridgestone, but to me this is the best in terms of quality-comfort-wear. Maybe a bit too soft, but that's for comfort's sake.

I consider this tire to be very worthy, true the price is a bit high, but if you disregard the price, the tire is super. I've been using them for the third season with a total mileage of around 55k, in a relaxed mode and mainly on a track, and I'm confident they could last the same amount. I'd give them a 5.

I'm using this tire for the second season. The driving style is calm. The mileage on this tire is around 8000. It's fairly noisy. It behaves normally in both dry and wet conditions, the car is predictable. The wear is almost zero. I recommend.

They ride well. .. but very weak to injury tires. Sidewalls are very weak. Not at all quiet. In terms of price-practice, they can withstand no criticism. This is a complete failure of Michelin.

Then, simple and Korean Kumho Kh17 were bought. They are inordinately cheap in comparison to Michelin. But strong like Bridgestone. I ride .... with no regrets about Michelin.

A very worthy tyre. But not cheap. A good option for those who like a comfortable and smooth ride but are dissatisfied with the noise and stiffness of their suspension. Very quiet. At least, in my tyre size, 175/65/r14. Soft - it perfectly smooths out bumps, doesn't vibrate, doesn't shake, doesn't itch. Economical in a highway cycle. For a smooth ride, the steering is filled with a pleasant weight, as if hinting -

When buying a car from France (Citroen), I had summer tires as a standard fitment - 205/55 R16. Honestly, I have a lot of driving experience and have owned many cars in my lifetime. After two seasons, I can say the following: the tire is worth its money, excellent performance, holds the road perfectly, whether on dry or wet roads. The noise insulation is factory-standard, yet there is no noise. The tire is excellent. As they say,

So two weeks on Misha, what can I write?

1) When installed on the rim - balanced well.

2) On noise I would say: very sensitive to temperature fluctuations, so in +10 it's as hard as a rock, even though the sidewall is soft, it gets quieter when +20 or well-heated.

In principle, I think it should be like that, after all, it's a summer tire, but honestly, I expected more from it.

3) On

Amazing alternative tyre!!! Noiseless, excellent grip in dry and wet conditions. Was previously on Bridgestone B250 - complete disaster!!! Michelin is one of the best. Installed on two cars. 185/65/14 - energy saver, 205/55/16 energy e3a. Very pleased with both tyres, would recommend.