Tyre reviews Michelin Energy Saver. Страница 4 1900
- Rate
I'm not too impressed with the tires, to be honest. They slide around like ice on a wet road, and the dirt and sand are their worst enemies. And recently, I got a flat and ended up with two blown-out tires. Next time I'll choose a different brand.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Spectra 1,8L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I read all the reviews and bought this trash three months ago. At first, I was pleased with the performance on water and traction, but after a week, I hit the first nail, then the second, and it just went on from there. I think it's too soft, which is why all the problems, and after two months I got a puncture in the ditch, as a result of a double-sided side wall, I check the pressure regularly and before the puncture, it was
- Vehicle:
- BMW 3 Coupe(E46) 2,0L 1999-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The tire was a freebie, so it's like sugar-water vinegar. In general, I'd say it's not worth the money. I was previously riding on a MAXIS made in Japan, which I liked more. As for this Michelin made in Russia, I wouldn't call it quiet, it's soft, and drifts slightly, but holds the course well. In turns, it gives the ability to correct the angle at high speeds (which was a surprise), holds well on wet
- Vehicle:
- Suzuki Baleno 1,6L 1995-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Ate almost all the tread in 1.5 seasons. Tends to wander on center. Suitable for relaxed driving at speeds of up to 160km/h, 205/55/16. Overall, a poor impression after a Yokohama c.drive, but quieter. Was so disappointed with it that I'd rather have another one.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Shuma 1,6L 1998-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought my Lada Latsati 195/60 R15 (speed rating 88T, made in Germany) over the internet. It differs from the original Hankook in softness, but still does not make the ride on the Lada's hard suspension comfortable. As for me, it's too noisy (and here, only soundproofing of the floor and wheel arches may help).
By the way, a friend bought the same model for his Chevrolet Aveo in size
- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Viva 1,8L 2005-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought a car with this tire (Megane 3 Coupé, 2L), and everything seemed to be fine, but when I'm starting from a traffic light, exiting a parking lot or similar conditions on a wet road, it's so noisy that ESP goes crazy... The car has good sound insulation, so the audible thuds on uneven asphalt make me wonder about the noise level of this tire... So, that's pretty much it, the downsides.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Megane Coupe (140) 2,0L 1999-2002
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've had these tires for 18 months now, and they've been wonderful, the wear is super. After 25,000 km they're only worn 4mm and now closest to renewal in another 20,000 km, performance still as good as day one!
- Vehicle:
- Renault Clio
- Size:
- 165/65 R14 T
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Average tire with a poor performance-to-price ratio. For half the price, I can get better tires (Marangoni, Hankook or even Nokian) that perform well, so I can change them twice for the same price.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Vel Satis 2.2 dci 150
- Size:
- 225/55 R17 ZR
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Noisy and uncomfortable tires that really don't do the small Passat justice. Most importantly: they don't deliver on their most important promised aspect! My fuel consumption is higher with these tires than with my winter tires (Michelin X-Ice 2). Furious.
- Vehicle:
- citroen xsara
- Size:
- 185/65 R14 H
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability
- Rate
Not bad tires for energy saving. They were on my car when I bought it almost 2 years ago, they had about 6 mm of tread left when I bought them. I swapped front and rear and got one pair to 20,000 miles and the other to 25,000. Very pleased with that. The tire performance is not disappointing, although on wet roads it's not top quality (but still better than many cheap branded tires I've driven before). The main drawback is that
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Passat TDI
- Size:
- 195/65 R15
- Buy again?:
- Возможно
- Control on a dry road
- Braking on dry roads
- Steering in the wet
- Braking on wet roads
- Drive comfort
- Internal noise
- External noise
- Wearability