Tyre reviews Michelin Energy Saver. Страница 4 1900

  • Michelin Energy Saver
    Michelin Energy Saver

Статистика отзывов на шины Michelin Energy Saver

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Michelin Energy Saver пользователями сайта: 4.72784 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Michelin Energy Saver: 1900 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 361
  • Место в рейтинге (летние): 212
Control on a dry road
Braking on dry roads
Steering in the wet
Braking on wet roads
Control on dirt
Drive comfort
Internal noise
Quiet in motion
Rate
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price/performance
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Michelin Energy Saver по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
2%
2
3%
3
6%
4
40%
5
49%
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    3.3

    I'm not too impressed with the tires, to be honest. They slide around like ice on a wet road, and the dirt and sand are their worst enemies. And recently, I got a flat and ended up with two blown-out tires. Next time I'll choose a different brand.

    Vehicle:
    Kia Spectra  1,8L  2003-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    2.8

    I read all the reviews and bought this trash three months ago. At first, I was pleased with the performance on water and traction, but after a week, I hit the first nail, then the second, and it just went on from there. I think it's too soft, which is why all the problems, and after two months I got a puncture in the ditch, as a result of a double-sided side wall, I check the pressure regularly and before the puncture, it was

    Vehicle:
    BMW 3 Coupe(E46)  2,0L  1999-2006
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    3.5

    The tire was a freebie, so it's like sugar-water vinegar. In general, I'd say it's not worth the money. I was previously riding on a MAXIS made in Japan, which I liked more. As for this Michelin made in Russia, I wouldn't call it quiet, it's soft, and drifts slightly, but holds the course well. In turns, it gives the ability to correct the angle at high speeds (which was a surprise), holds well on wet

    Vehicle:
    Suzuki Baleno  1,6L  1995-2006
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    3.5

    Ate almost all the tread in 1.5 seasons. Tends to wander on center. Suitable for relaxed driving at speeds of up to 160km/h, 205/55/16. Overall, a poor impression after a Yokohama c.drive, but quieter. Was so disappointed with it that I'd rather have another one.

    Vehicle:
    Kia Shuma  1,6L  1998-2006
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    4.1

    I bought my Lada Latsati 195/60 R15 (speed rating 88T, made in Germany) over the internet. It differs from the original Hankook in softness, but still does not make the ride on the Lada's hard suspension comfortable. As for me, it's too noisy (and here, only soundproofing of the floor and wheel arches may help).

    By the way, a friend bought the same model for his Chevrolet Aveo in size

    Vehicle:
    Chevrolet Viva  1,8L  2005-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin Energy Saver

    Rate
    4.1

    I bought a car with this tire (Megane 3 Coupé, 2L), and everything seemed to be fine, but when I'm starting from a traffic light, exiting a parking lot or similar conditions on a wet road, it's so noisy that ESP goes crazy... The car has good sound insulation, so the audible thuds on uneven asphalt make me wonder about the noise level of this tire... So, that's pretty much it, the downsides.

    Vehicle:
    Renault Megane Coupe (140)  2,0L  1999-2002
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Michelin ENERGY SAVER

    Rate
    4.9

    I've had these tires for 18 months now, and they've been wonderful, the wear is super. After 25,000 km they're only worn 4mm and now closest to renewal in another 20,000 km, performance still as good as day one!

    Vehicle:
    Renault Clio
    Size:
    165/65 R14 T
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Braking on dry roads
    Steering in the wet
    Braking on wet roads
    Drive comfort
    Internal noise
    External noise
    Wearability
  • about tyre Michelin ENERGY SAVER

    Rate
    2.5

    Average tire with a poor performance-to-price ratio. For half the price, I can get better tires (Marangoni, Hankook or even Nokian) that perform well, so I can change them twice for the same price.

    Vehicle:
    Renault Vel Satis 2.2 dci 150
    Size:
    225/55 R17 ZR
    Buy again?:
    More likely not
    Control on a dry road
    Braking on dry roads
    Steering in the wet
    Braking on wet roads
    Drive comfort
    Internal noise
    External noise
    Wearability
  • about tyre Michelin ENERGY SAVER

    Rate
    3.1

    Noisy and uncomfortable tires that really don't do the small Passat justice. Most importantly: they don't deliver on their most important promised aspect! My fuel consumption is higher with these tires than with my winter tires (Michelin X-Ice 2). Furious.

    Vehicle:
    citroen xsara
    Size:
    185/65 R14 H
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    Control on a dry road
    Braking on dry roads
    Steering in the wet
    Braking on wet roads
    Drive comfort
    Internal noise
    External noise
    Wearability
  • about tyre Michelin ENERGY SAVER

    Rate
    4

    Not bad tires for energy saving. They were on my car when I bought it almost 2 years ago, they had about 6 mm of tread left when I bought them. I swapped front and rear and got one pair to 20,000 miles and the other to 25,000. Very pleased with that. The tire performance is not disappointing, although on wet roads it's not top quality (but still better than many cheap branded tires I've driven before). The main drawback is that

    Vehicle:
    Volkswagen Passat TDI
    Size:
    195/65 R15
    Buy again?:
    Возможно
    Control on a dry road
    Braking on dry roads
    Steering in the wet
    Braking on wet roads
    Drive comfort
    Internal noise
    External noise
    Wearability