Tyre reviews Dunlop GrandTrek AT25. Page 1 23

I bought after AT 22. Long searched and read reviews and options. I considered both traction and strength and resistance to rolling and brake qualities (did not quite satisfy on AT 22) I decided to try AT 25. Better than AT 22 clearly by 30% exactly and by braking and by traction. Installed in the spring, after which snow fell. On the snow braking and acceleration are sure and quite comparable to winter tires (I had a Hakkapeliitta 7 before)

Good tire. Ran 50,000 km on previous AT23, no issues, wore out through my own neglect, blowout+overloading with trailer, but still basically alive. Balanced wheels, decent noise level, quite passable on rough terrain, normal bead, withstands extreme climate conditions from -40 to +50 degrees Celsius well. Never punctured or cracked, only one self-tapping screw throughout the entire time. Repairs well and holds the repair well.

Size: 265/65 R17 Prado 150
Excellent tyre, lightweight, reinforced sidewalls, quiet, wear-resistant, indifferent to wheel track. Never driven on ice and don't intend to.

These tires were installed on a new car I bought from an official dealer.

The front ones became unusable, it's unclear why the right tire's edge was worn out, although the car was new and had its wheels aligned.

The choice was limited, with Pirelli and Dunlop being the more or less well-known options, and the rest being Chinese products, so I bought the more expensive ones - Dunlop. Time will tell if they're suitable for this car or not, but after a mileage of 5000 km, everything is fine. They're also well-balanced, with minimal weights.

The sales and service at Mosavtoshin are at a very high level, which deserves a solid 5+ rating.