Tyre reviews Nokian WR G2. Page 11 2341

Price-quality ratio 5 points

Bought on 22.12.08, mileage 2000 thousand, driving mainly through mountain passes, since I often drive to Lviv, holds the road well, stable on turns. Ice? In my opinion, any tire without metal studs doesn't hold on ice. And for the price of 470 UAH per piece, it's just super, better than Amtele for 360 UAH. And as for speed, mainly on packed snow

for their money is normal

tire created for ordinary Kiev winter - through the mud and dirt excellent. On ice, of course, not very good, but how many days do we drive on ice and how much mud do we have? Focused on working with ABS, at first it was unusual, then everything is fine. Some problems on cobblestone. Good free rolling - like on summer (felt in traffic jams).

Tires are crap

The tire salesman himself, and all tire salesmen think the same way, they'll just push whatever they have, whoever saw a tire fitter who would drive on Nokian WR G2, maybe it's okay for Europe, but not for Ukraine with its winters, it can be different: snowdrifts, black ice, unplowed roads...

Was hoping for better

The previous car had a simple VR. The second generation appeared in 2007. Took it with complete confidence that it would be even better. On dry roads, it drives perfectly, on wet roads, it's not worse! But this is still a winter tire, but unfortunately, snow is simply contraindicated for it! After a night of snow, it often becomes a problem to leave the yard (just to move from the spot). On clean ice,

Reliably and safely

Driven from mid-autumn to the end of March. Holds the road perfectly, both on dry and snowy surfaces. On slush, it sometimes pulls, but not strongly. There is noise, but it also largely depends on the car, in my opinion. The most pleasant and important thing is that at the end of the season, the tire withstood a hit into a decent pothole at a speed of 70-80 km/h. At first,

For a soft European winter

I've already driven it for the 2nd season. Good tires for slush and wet roads. I took it just because I mainly drive in the city where the roads are cleaned. And also, the winters in our area have not been so severe lately, so for the slush that prevails on our roads in winter, it's just right. It drives moderately on snow, the main thing is not to make sharp maneuvers and brakes, get used to

Excellent tires for St. Petersburg's winter on a powerful car!

Recommended by rallyists! On asphalt, it's like a bad summer, squeals when braking, and understeers on turns. But compared to studded tires and HKPL4, it's a mega-gripper! In the city in winter - that's what you need! :) On slush/water/puddles - excellent! On snow - it grips, on ice - normal. I recommend, forget about

so-so

despite the speed index for 2 winters (Kiev, total 20 thousand) they wore out, the second winter was quite tough, had to catch them often... Although it's XL - there are 2 bulges, accordingly, I won't pay just for the weight anymore...

The tire is quite hard, but it's cheap
After replacing, I noticed that it's much harder than the summer tire (Nokian Hakkapeliitta V) and, accordingly, noisier. But it works very well on wet snow and dry asphalt, the ABS never kicked in. I don't expect anything good on ice due to its hardness. But - we'll see. The price is just great.
Pros: good grip on wet roads, cheap

Tires are just a bomb, especially wet snow (high slush).
Impression of sticking to the road surface.
Pros: Low noise, reliability, stability, soft ride.
Cons: Not identified