Tyre reviews Nokian WR G2. Page 7 2341

For this money, it's just excellent winter tires

I bought it a week ago, immediately changed the wheels, the next day there was a lot of snow, so I immediately went into the snowdrifts, I was interested in how it would behave in the snow on ice, etc. So, I don't know who writes that it's stiff, noisy, and that it has lateral sway, it's all nonsense. All my acquaintances who drove with me were satisfied with the

Her element is a wet road

Quiet, gripping tires. Holds well on wet roads, also good on mud. Instead of air, I filled it with nitrogen - it rides on tram rails and you can't hear it. I had summer "Mishelin Pilot Premacy" before, and Nokian is even quieter. Its temperature index is "A", so I think this tire is closer to all-season. I haven't tried it on ice yet. Ideal tire for the price and

I'm in doubt

I "re-shod" only today. From the tire shop to the garage is 50 meters. The tread alarms me: either I was given an incomplete set at the store (the tire fitter assures me that everything is in order), or is it supposed to be that the left tire treads in the opposite direction from the right one? In my understanding, ASYMMETRIC means the presence of longitudinal and transverse "grips" in one tire

Expected more.

I took a long time to choose WR G2 - I was tempted by the interesting tread pattern and warranty. I compared the G2 with the simple Nokian W (which is on my father's Lanos) - I liked the simple W more, it grips better on snow and ice, is cheaper and has a higher and more branched tread. I think it's not worth paying more. Strangely, I felt more confident on the W. The G

It's too early to say, I've just put them on

Reviews are expensive, who goes to the forest, who for firewood. I won't say anything until I've checked myself, how it will behave, but judging by the tread pattern, it should go well, the longitudinal grooves will give direction of movement on ice in ABS, the other half shouldn't give wheel slip on snow. We'll drive and see, because we haven't had winters with ice and snowy mush

Excellent tires. Nokian tires, just like their phones, are unbeatable!

On ice, even with the handbrake on while braking, it slightly skids. In the village, a snowstorm with snow above the bumper - It worked out. It loves mud a lot, can be rated 5+. Previously had Good year ultra - AWFUL!

Good tires. Expensive, but I don't regret buying them.
I drive out of town, to go fishing. On ice, 80 km/h is confident, no skidding, no drifting. On snow, it grips well. I accelerate up snowy hills. On dry asphalt, 140 km/h is confident, on wet asphalt, 110 km/h is clear and holds well. When braking sharply on ice or snow, it pulls a bit.
Pros: holds the

Excellent tires for Baltic roads.

I've driven quite a few kilometers, the element of this tire is a wet road, puddles, mud, slush and all that kind of stuff :) For moving around the city and highway when the temperature varies from +15 to -15, it's perfect. For urban roads and highways that usually have slush, mud, and puddles, the choice is justified 100%. On snow, it also copes quite well, on ice a bit

Good tire

Good tire, very predictable. It saved my life and the lives of my three passengers this winter in the Carpathians on a mountain serpent. For a mixed cycle of city-70%/suburb-30%, you can't think of anything better. Quiet on any surface, it showed itself perfectly in the city on wet asphalt, snowy slush and dry surface at sub-zero temperatures. One minus - it doesn't handle ice.

Pros: Its element is our

Agreed! Absolutely.

To be fair, I decided to add that I used to drive on Nokian W. So, it's not much better than WR G2 on snow and slush, also useless on ice, and significantly inferior on wet asphalt. As for comfort (softness and especially noise), it's simply incomparable. So, the new generation is definitely better. Many summer tires are even noisier than WR G2, for example, Pirelli P