Tyre reviews Nokian WR G2. Page 10 2341

For this money it's excellent

Actually, it's not easy to write about tires after driving 1,000-2,000 km. I drove 1,000 km on WR G2 and I'm satisfied, I expected more noise and hum from winter tires. On dry asphalt in frost, it goes excellent, it holds the road, if you don't press the gas pedal like crazy, and on wet asphalt, it's no question. On ice, compared to summer tires,

Decent tires
For a month of winter, I haven't seen any snow yet, but I've driven 4,000 kilometers on asphalt, no complaints, sometimes I forgot that I'm not on summer tires. I'm waiting for a snowy road, hoping it won't let me down...
Pros: Price-quality-best
Cons: -

worth its money 530grn

KHARKOV. Bought on 24.12.2008, all 4 wheels for Logan 1.6 on native 15 disks, what to say - for its money 530.00grn there is no alternative, below this price only budget ones. The choice was between Fulda Montero Crystal 2, which was 200.00grn cheaper for a set. But 1 year warranty on Nokian and the

Never again, not even for less money

Colleagues, I don't understand, who has this tire that DOESN'T slip and under what conditions? Ice - like ice skating; Snow - just press the gas a bit - it skids, drifts and other winter fun; Wet - I was jumping over "police" - pedestrians appeared - full brakes - the car is moving :((( On dry roads, nothing special, I won't take up your time. I drove on

tire for one season
The first season behaved perfectly on snow and ice, this season is a complete crap, snow is still okay, but it doesn't drive on ice at all.
Pros: great tire for winter without snow and ice
Cons: tire for one season

Excellent winter tires

I installed these tires in November of this year, when the temperature outside was from +10 to +15, and immediately got disappointed several times - they seemed excessively hard, but with the onset of frost, the wr g2 really became softer. On wet, dry, snowy, and icy roads, the car is equally well-handling - both straight and in turns. I've driven over 4000 km on them. Previously, I changed two sets of Nord Frost

Loved
Replaced Gislaved Euro Frost 3 with a mileage of 35000 with this one... The replacement is equivalent, but the new Gislaved was better on snow.... In general, the tire did not disappoint... Although when driving on rolled snow and ice, you need to be careful, full-fledged winter is not its element.
Pros: Excellent city tire
Cons: Ice and snow

Not bad tire

Not bad. I was initially skeptical about symmetry. The car is stable, rides quietly. On strongly rolled snow, I think, it rides worse than on bare ice. On slush, fresh snow, water, etc. - excellent

NORMAL FOR SUCH MONEY!
I personally like it very much! For our winter in Moldova, it's just right for snow, dry and wet roads, I really liked it! And if you want a couple of drifts, just add some gas :)
Pros: not expensive and holds the road well!
Cons: ice

It's worth its money

an absolutely normal tire. Those who are here scolding it either burned out or themselves do not know what they want. Without questions, if someone rode on better tires and moved to this one, there is a difference. But then don't wave and pay at least 50% more money and you'll have what you want. Or you paid 500 UAH for a tire and want it to drive on ice to Mount Hoverla, it doesn't