Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka Blue 2 98

215/55/16 Soft and comfortable tire, holds well on wet roads, minimal aquaplaning effect while new. Now about the sad part: after a seasonal run of 28,000 km (99% highway) I have a remaining tread depth of 3, of course, you can only remember handling on a wet road. The wear is such that I'm not sure if it's worth keeping for the next season as, at my mileage, from 1 to 3,

Installed on my Volkswagen T4 Transporter, size 205/65 R16 99V XL, with a single tire load capacity of 775 kg, not the "Tseshka" recommended for this vehicle, but still 775 kg is 3 tons of total load capacity. Since the car weighs 2 tons and I drive empty, and "Tseshka" is very hard and expensive, I decided to put this tire, which is softer and cheaper. But apparently, the tire

I weighed my options for a long time and settled on this model. The car's handling and stability in heavy rain are reassuring. However, the wear and tear is a concern: after a summer and 12,000 km, the front tires have 5 mm (initially 8 mm) and the rears have 6-7 mm (initially 8 mm). I'm not sure if it will last the season, and I'm not confident it will make it to two.

Hello everyone! We've been driving on these tires for almost a month now, and I can already share some of my impressions. As for tread wear, I can't say much yet, as we haven't covered enough distance. However, immediately after installing the tires on my car, I was pleasantly surprised by their low noise level, especially on new asphalt. There were even moments when I felt as if I was flying, as if on a smooth road. Unfortunately, there's not much asphalt like

The tire in all respects is good (R16 215/55). No aquaplaning, excellent traction, robust side wall, low noise, good tread even in mud, you can drive like a tank. However, one minus is the wild wear. After the first year (25,000 km) almost three units on the front and rear wheels. Now after 60,000 km, six units. Maybe it's normal, but I would like to use it for longer.

Very good on water, and a bit abrasive. Never tried it on snow, and I don't plan to.

Nokia is always good. Spent a long time choosing from this price category. They hold well on the road, at any speed. They behave well on road humps. I can't say much about wear, I've driven little. Previously, I had Nokian Hakka tires as well. They served for around 70,000 km and seven years. Interestingly, two Finnish and two Russian wheels were installed. Wear was almost identical. Just now they sell only Russian ones.

On dry and wet asphalt, the road holds well, the tire doesn't aquaplane, and there are no strong jerks. At turn speeds, the tire well holds the car, slightly noisy, by durability of the tire it will be enough for about two seasons at daily car use.

Excellent tires, good aquaplaning properties, relatively quiet.

Quite grippy and brake well. Go well in a track too. No major complaints about them. The driving style is quite dynamic - 70% city, 25% highway, 5% dirt roads.

A regular tire, neither quiet nor loud, while new, holds wet asphalt well, standard size 205 on 55, 16 radius in the tread throws, for such money you could have come up with a more serious tire! Already bursts after 100 km, a regular medium-tread tire is overpriced, I found a screw on a new balloon, tiny, warranty works! The only plus, I won't buy it again, for 2000 for a city ride,