Tyre reviews Michelin Latitude Tour HP. Page 3 352

The main advantage is wear-resistant. Soft to a certain extent. Medium-noisy. Holds the track somewhat weakly. Off-road, in mud, it's better not to climb. Ice is contraindicated. If four-wheel drive will go through snow. Conclusion: tires for 5-6 seasons from April to November. City, highway, off-road without mud. No winter with ice.

In my opinion, the best tire. I constantly buy it when the size is available. It's quiet, soft, predictable and very comfortable.

I'll start with the downsides to justify my low rating. The tires had to be balanced extremely frequently, with the weight constantly shifting as if they had never been balanced at all. The steering wheel vibrates noticeably at speeds of 115-130 km/h. You can get used to it, but it raises concerns about safety. Initially, I suspected a technical issue with the car, so I checked, searched, and put it on a stand - nothing was found, until the season forced me to replace the LATITUDE TOUR HP with X-ICE SNOW. All vibrations across all speed ranges disappeared instantly. The country of origin is Poland, and I was warned about the quality of their products, but I didn't believe it.

The tires are 1 year old, and I've driven them for 1 season, but to avoid the sidewalls from disintegrating, I'll have to get something else. The purchase price was premium, just like the product itself. It's a great pity.

About the good things.

Compared to the stock Bridgestone, the Michelin LATITUDE TOUR HP tires were significantly better. It's like night and day. The car felt completely different - more manageable, predictable, and I gained confidence in overtaking, braking, and driving on wet asphalt. These are very good tires, if you ignore the glaring defect of imbalance and wheel vibration.

The ideal tire for ideal roads! The reality is as follows: very poor tracking stability on the track (with the previous tire, I didn't even notice the track), the tire is not hard, but every small stone is felt, not to mention the rails. In short, would I buy this tire again - rather no than yes.

Excellent tire, I've been driving on Michelin for a long time, to be honest, on a Porsche, I decided to try it on a Niva, it exceeded all expectations in the mountains on the serpentines, I don't even think I'm on a Niva, it handles turns with ease, if you don't mind spending money and want to feel safe, don't hesitate.

Of course, 300 km is not a mileage for comparing the characteristics of tires, but the words of my wife in the first kilometers after replacing Bridgestone with Michelin, "Did you make sound insulation?", speak about the effectiveness of the products of this tire manufacturer. The tires are summer ones, and I don't drive in winter, so I put 1 for snow and ice handling characteristics. I rated all other characteristics 5 points. The tires are indeed quiet, resistant to aquaplaning and directional stability. The only thing that is not satisfactory is the price, one of the highest in its class.

Fitted to my Cruze 200, after Continental. The car became even smoother. Excellent handling, and what else would you expect from Michelin? I would recommend.

Satisfactory tread life, compared to Toyo's OE product.
Soft and quiet ride.
Good traction in the rain.

I bought Bridgestone Turanza, then looked for a low-noise option. I read a lot of reviews and decided the Tour HP would be quieter than the Sport 3 and 4. I drove it for a month before winter arrived. I regretted buying it every day. The only plus was the quiet ride. It handles potholes well. The machine became more rough due to the fine-cut tread. It's not suitable for aggressive driving. I wanted to sell it in the

I am very satisfied with the tires. I think it is not correct to ask how a summer tire behaves in snow and ice. It does not behave, it simply slips.