Tyre reviews Continental ContiIceContact 2. Page 2 947

Blowout proof. Quiet. Good side resistance. Wet, snow, ice – not a problem. And I drive rather aggressively. Recommend.

I had to choose for a while, there aren't many good reviews. I decided to take the risk and pay extra for the brand (this one is made in Germany), before that I had the GoodYear UltraGrip Arctic, I compared them, GoodYear brakes and accelerates well due to its long (wide cross) studs, Continental didn't let me down in this regard and as a plus (which is lacking in GoodYear) - excellent stability to deflations (GoodYear again loses

Pros: holds well on dry and wet asphalt, snow slush, packed snow, black ice. Quiet running with sharp blades for the first 700-800 km.
Cons: seemed a bit too stiff. Before that I drove on Michelin, which were softer. The price is a bit biting. However, I bought at Mosavto in early September at a good price.
I put on the tires in advance, not at the first snow, to allow the

The purchase fully justified my expectations, for the entire period of use not a single stud fell off, taking into account the winter, which was snowless and almost frostless, I think this is a good result for a studded tire. A bit noisy, but considering the number of studs on the tire, I consider this acceptable, the price is certainly expensive, but I don't regret buying these tires.

My tires have gone through 4 winters. That's a good amount of life! At the time of purchase, the tread was around 40,000 km. Now it's 142,000 km on two sets of tires.
What can be said:
Pros - Quiet, very precise steering, and a light wheel.
Cons - Expensive, after three winters it almost lost the tread, on the fourth winter it almost didn't brake and didn't

Excellent tire. Handling, braking, acceleration - no complaints. Tested in amateur racing. First places in ice racing.

I bought this tire in the spring and managed to get about two months of mileage out of it. The car is a Toyota Corolla 150. Before that, it had Yokohama tires, so I can only compare them to those. To be honest, there's no real need to compare - I was pleasantly surprised how well the winter tire brakes on ice and holds the course. The car no longer floats on the road. When changing lanes now, I don't have to worry about drifting

Up until now, I have been driving for 3 seasons on ContiIceContact first generation tires and I have been really satisfied with the performance. This autumn I changed my car and I decided to get the second generation of ContiIceContact for the winter. I have no regrets about this choice. The positives include a quiet ride, the tire holds the road very well, whether dry or snow-covered, and it doesn't drift in turns. The only minuses for me are that the tire

Excellent tires. Ordered by father for his 4x4. Took first studded tires in life- due to a rather long and snowy winter in Moscow. Excellent handling on packed snow and on ice, also not giving up on asphalt. The studs suggest a long service life.

They grip the road great on ice and slippery roads. Not loud, relatively soft. I'll only buy them for winter from now on.