Tyre reviews Michelin Primacy 4. Page 2 276

Great tires! I put 215/60R17 on my Teana instead of the original 215/55R17. Nothing sticks. The car becomes a bit taller, which is important for the Teana, and softer.

Best summer tire. Quiet, comfortable.
Promotes aggressive, high-speed driving.
The price, of course, is high, but the tires are worth it.

Good quiet tyres, but expensive, have to buy on sale. Rain is excellent. Speed is excellent. Wear resistance I wouldn't say yet, don't drive in the mud

Hello!

I bought a replacement for Michelin Primacy HP MO, it was still the original, so I noticed that it was softer than the original, which was stiffer, but in terms of handling and aquaplaning they were on par. It's too early to say anything about durability.

The tires were liked. You feel premium in everything. Little noise, elasticity, the ride has become more comfortable. They stood until replacement with Yakohama from the factory. I have nothing bad to say about them. They have driven their 50,000 km worthily without damage and excesses.

With Michelin, the car has become especially confident on wet pavement. This is very noticeable. Good traction. They hold the arc well. For everyday driving, the tires are excellent. If there is an opportunity, I recommend taking them.

The 4+ is an upgraded version of the 4. I drove 40-45 thousand kilometers on the 4 over 4 years, and two tires developed bulges on the tread!!! The sidewall is strong, I have to give it that. The tires were sent to Michelin for inspection! The response in two words: "Non-penetrating cuts, that's why the cord is rotten..." This is my first experience with tires like this, and I've driven over 900,000 kilometers in 22 years! I've been driving on Michelin tires since 2010, always with zero tread wear. Now I don't see the point in overpaying. But unfortunately, I had to buy 2 tires at the price of a set of Chinese ones...

Draw your own conclusions

I hope this will be useful to someone, until they delete the review, but I'll write it again! It's very frustrating that the tire is not worn out, the sidewall is intact, and it's going to waste!

My friend recommended these tires to me. As always, Michelin is top notch. My car is completely different to drive, it grips the road perfectly and doesn't slip on the asphalt. Soft, quiet and exceptional. I highly recommend!

Mounted 6 225/40R18 on the golf previously had ContiSportContact 5 Michelin much softer quieter more comfortable will continue to drive and update later.

The tires were purchased in the spring of 2019 in the size 205/60 R16. Produced 5217, i.e. in the 52nd week of 2017, at the very end of 2017. They lay in warehouses for a little over a year, which is not much. Initially, 2 seasons - premium. Quiet, gripping, everything is fine. By the third season, or approximately after 15,000 km, I started to notice noise from them. After winter tires, it's especially noticeable and uncomfortable. Noise and sharp wear. Apparently, they became plastic-like. The asphalt adhesion started to bother me, it takes effort to pull them out of a rut. In the 4th season, they started to slip when starting on wet asphalt and brakes with ABS... The 5th season was just a nightmare, it was terrible, and I didn't care about the tires. In total: the tread for 37,000 km is almost to the indicators, from 20,000 km it's a slippery, noisy, rut-prone disappointment. Not premium. I don't even know what ratings to give. Probably, it would be fair to put average arithmetic ratings for the period of operation, since I didn't wear them down to the cord and threads, and there are 2 mm left to the indicators.

Excellent tires despite being Russian-made, handling is normal.
Well-balanced on 16-inch disks. On wet asphalt, it doesn't throw to the side, keeps a straight line. At low speed, there is a slight hum, but when it exceeds 100, it rides quietly and confidently.
On dirt, it pulls slightly.
For this price, excellent tires.
I recommend purchasing, softer than Bridgestone.