Tyre reviews Dunlop SP Sport LM703. Page 2 120
- Rate
I bought tyres last spring. There aren't many choices in my size, 215/60/16, in our city, with Michelin and Dunlop available. I chose Dunlop. The positives are that it handles well in any weather and is confident in its performance. The negatives are that it wears out very quickly and is noisy. Mileage of 30,000 km is sufficient for another 5 thousand kilometres, but this is a very short lifespan from a Thai manufacturer.
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Sharan 1,8L 1999-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought a used tire with about 60% tread life left. I ran it for 2.5 seasons (around 20-25 thousand km). My driving style is extremely aggressive. When I hit a pothole, I bent the alloy wheel, and damaged the strut – then a bulge appeared on the tire. So, I consider these tires to be strong.
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Celica T18 4WD 2,0L Turbo 1989-1993
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I liked the design of the tread / price / brand. Unfortunately, there were few reviews, but I still took it. The size is 215/55 R17. Excellent tire!! Silence in the cabin on the highway, excellent braking, no issues driving at 120 in the rain. I drove 1600 km in 3 days on a highway and moderate off-road. Sideslip is less than on GoodYear, but the tire is comfortable. Prior to this, I had
- Vehicle:
- Subaru Legacy Outback 2,5L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I was choosing between Michelin Russian and Dunlop, and I chose the latter. Considering the moderately aggressive driving style, I looked at the road performance and braking results, and since there's congestion in the Moscow region now, the Muscovites, who have moved out of their dachas after the snow, frequently make such maneuvers that make the tires smoke while braking. The Michelin Russian, which I inherited from the previous owner, was like a Russian roulette - the car would skid and
- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Passat 1,8L 1988-1996
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Over the weekend, I put on a LM703 on my CR-V - 215/65 R15. I haven't had a chance to break it in properly yet, but I thought it would be an improvement. After Dunlop SP Sport 9000, the tire seems overly noisy and 'stiff' - it whines and reacts with a delay when shifting gears. If I let the pressure drop, it becomes less noisy, but starts to oscillate more. I also realized that this
- Vehicle:
- Honda CR-V 2,0L 2000-2003
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've been on this tire for over 6 seasons and it holds up well, even for a big and rough vehicle like a minivan (215/70/15 size). On dry roads, it holds and brakes stably, and on wet asphalt, everything is fine too, there is no aquaplaning, but only on shallow puddles, which is logical, considering the price, 5 out of 5. Wear resistance is good, even taking into account that 70%
- Vehicle:
- Chrysler Grand Voyager
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Good tread, made in Thailand, excellent traction on wet road, very quiet.
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Lancer
- Size:
- 215/45 R18 89W
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Минск
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Worthy tires.
The only thing that slightly worries me is the durability, the rear tires wear off surprisingly quickly, may depend on driving style.- Vehicle:
- BMW 3 (E90, E91, E92, E93)
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
For budget cars - OK
But for heavy, fast and powerful cars - there are tires that are much better for this price.- Vehicle:
- Volkswagen Polo
- Size:
- 175/60 R15 81H
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good tire, best price/quality ratio, I'm satisfied!
- Vehicle:
- Pontiac Vibe
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability