Tyre reviews Dunlop Digi-Tyre Eco EC 201. Page 2 109

Normal tire. Went through the summer season, about 14,000 km. Excellent lateral stability, never squealed, dry grip in corners well. Aquaplaning only if entering the puddle without noticing, at high speed. Quiet. Minuses - fairly significant wear for such mileage. Made in Indonesia.

Honestly, terrible tire. I won't buy again after saving money... ABS doesn't work, write about it immediately. On dry asphalt with 90 km/h a huge braking distance. On wet a disaster, holds the road poorly, high aquaplaning, braking distance on 3 with effort. The pros: doesn't make much noise, isn't afraid of potholes (195/65/15). In general, it's suitable for a leisurely drive, but in my opinion

Installed in April, driven 10000 km. A good tire for 2000 rubles. Soft and comfortable, brakes well on dry asphalt, slightly worse on wet pavement, as expected from all tires. Almost no noise, normal on wet roads at reasonable speeds, be careful on overtake in puddles - floats, though I've never heard of a tire that doesn't float. Handling is worse than Barum, but better than Amtel and Cordiant. Traction is average. Recommend

Good quality tyre at an affordable price for casual driving. Surprisingly good grip on wet road at 0 degrees temperature. Was caught off guard by sudden snow, thought I'd be walking with skis instead of tyres, but they performed well. (Made in Indonesia).

Sufficiently soft rubber, when I thought it would be stiffer, allows maximum entry into turns, overall and in general, comfortable rubber. It will be better than the Continental Conti Eco 3, but lags behind such tires as the Goodyear Eagle Ventura and Kumho Solus KH17. The main thing when buying is to take rubber with a JP index.

The tire surprised me. On a wet track, it's scary to drive over 80 km/h, especially in smooth turns, you get into a small puddle and you're drifting straight. On the driving wheels, about 20% of the tread remained for the season. But the tire is for those who drive a little on weekends and in the city. It's quiet, soft, comfortable, and of course, eco-friendly (judging by the description).

Subjectively better Debiáce in handling
For me, as not a particularly experienced driver, I don't see any drawbacks except one - NOISE. Moreover, some kind of strange, after 80-th it passes.... I have a sens.
Pluses: softness, stability
Minuses: NOISE

Quiet, soft.

Installed in the spring at a temperature of +7. Often wheelspins when starting to move. Found out that the car has ABS. It triggers very often. Driving style is normal. In the summer, it behaves perfectly, drove in the rain on the track just great. I'm afraid that in the fall I'll have to change to studded tires as soon as the first snow falls. With its tread pattern and before going to the tire shop in the snow,

Normal tires for their money

I shod two Lanos cars. After Debica, quite decent tires. On one car, I've already driven 40,000 km on them and still have tread left. On a wet road, it skids in a turn. For those who need cheap tires for everyday use, it's a good option (I bought them for $35)

Average tire for the money

I've driven 15,000 miles on these tires. The tire behaves perfectly on wet asphalt, it feels like it's better than on dry asphalt. It holds the car well in turns. I've driven into sand with it, the car confidently passed through, but in mud, it's like driving on ice, when entering the mud, the tire tread fills up with it, which gets stuck in it, and when exiting onto a dry, paved dirt road