Tyre reviews Continental ContiPremiumContact 2. Page 2 2738
- Rate
In principle, everything is not bad. The minus is the lack of traction
I drove into the field to relax and then it rained. As a result, the lower "lip" of the bumper was torn off. I got dirty because I had to push the car
Pros: holds the road
Cons: complete failure on mud- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Normal tires, but can be better
I have stot on Civic, on dry and wet asphalt is excellent, on dirt and sand, namely loose, is excellent, but on mud, like a cow on ice, I think it's a bit noisy, but it turned out that the wheels were over-pumped in the salon.
Pros: Stability in wet and dry weather
Cons: afraid of mud- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Excellent
3 seasons, could have been more, but wear on 1 wheel (no alignment done), tossing from side to side for even wear. During this time, I killed 4 Pirellis and 2 square discs in the winter (got bulges, burst), and these ones are still alive, although I hit potholes really hard, 1 disc became a house. Excellent tire for asphalt. A bit noisy. But very wear-resistant and shock-resistant.
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
I took these tires based on my own experience of using this model for 13 years, although they were made in Germany. I think ours have also learned, so to speak, adopted the technology, so the decision to buy was made, especially since the store offered a low price
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Camry
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
An excellent summer tire, using the second set. After the standard Bridgestone, all characteristics are much better, except for wear.
- Vehicle:
- Ford Focus
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
The tires are good, but the ad didn't mention that they were from 2017, I bought them in 2023! I picked them up at my own risk!!!
In terms of quality, I was surprised by the directional stability and handling on the road, time will tell about the wear! Good luck on the roads!!!
- Vehicle:
- ВАЗ Vesta
- Size:
- 205/50 R17 89W RF
- Buy again?:
- More likely not
- City:
- Voronezh
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
When I bought it, they said it was only for a maximum of 2 seasons, but I managed to drive it for a full 3 (in one piece), true, but it's still 3. Excellent handling on both dry and wet asphalt, but there's a caveat - it's only for asphalt. If you drive on wet soil without additional systems, you might as well get a tractor. =) The tire is very nice, soft, and to my mind almost noiseless,
- Vehicle:
- Renault Megane 2 1,5TD 2002-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Occasionally bought this brand after a blowout of two tires.
Compared to the standard Bridgestone and Uniroyal.
- Hold the track confidently in turns on dry and wet pavement
- No rear axle skidding in turns
- Relatively noisy
- Good speedometer readings due to the lightness of the tires
- Excellent braking performance
- Quickly warmed up tires
- Resistant to aquaplaning- Vehicle:
- Mazda 3 1,6L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
The tire ran on a YETI c from the factory. Either a 95 tread rating is too weak for a crossover, or the sidewall quality is that bad. In the first season, two punctures without obvious impacts or curb hits. The set had to be replaced almost new. A Michelin Latitude was acquired, much quieter compared - the conic not comfortable.
- Vehicle:
- Skoda Roomster 1,2L 2007-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Ran on ContiPremiumContact tires for two seasons, no doubts about putting them on for the third. Tires are great on dry and wet roads. Good wear resistance - the rubber wears out very evenly! Extremely quiet, I drive and enjoy. Next tires will only be from Continental.
- Vehicle:
- Audi TT 2,0L 2006-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
