Tyre reviews Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5. Страница 9 368
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Very nice tire, everything is fine except for the howl of the studs at high speed, otherwise there are no complaints about the tire.
- Vehicle:
- Subaru Forester
- Size:
- 225/60 R17 103T XL
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Кызыл
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Disadvantages: - Too expensive for our production or brand money; - First winter until after 7 studs did not appear on each tire after 4,000 km run; - Ditches small groove in the asphalt to the inside; - Small stones tend to live in the tread; - Does not pass over a screw.
On the fourth winter with a small run did not suffice, the cord broke and two balloons became helicopters, began to look for 2 wheels to
- Vehicle:
- SsangYong Rodius 2,7L 2005-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
For three seasons, I've lost about 3-5 studs on each tire. Very noisy, especially noticeable on cars with poor soundproofing. Big braking distance on asphalt.
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi RVR 1,8L 1992-1998
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Great tire! Got it with the car, already worn out, but it's performing amazingly! Low noise level for studs! I'm thinking I'll sell it and make some profit! But I'll be riding on Pirelli ATR in the winter, it's okay, and I'm done with paying those clumsy tire shop guys. If I wanted to buy studs, I would have bought Hakkapeliitta!
- Vehicle:
- Ford Explorer 2WD 4,0L 1991-1999
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
A tire with a three-star rating.
Down to -5°C everything is fine, if lower you need to drive 15-20 km to warm it up, then the road (track) holds perfectly.
When driving in the city, it's very bad, brakes terribly.
In the winter, in the courtyards, couldn't overcome a 5cm snowbank from a stop.
Before this, I had Kleber Kapnor5- Vehicle:
- Volvo 960 2,9L 1990-1996
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought the tire 4 days ago, and after installing it, the next day the tire went flat. At the authorized center, they found a crack (or puncture) from the inside of the tire and refused to replace it, citing repairability. It's very disappointing to have paid 11,000 rubles for a tire and ride on a "new" tire with patches. I won't buy another tire like this and wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Sorento 3,5L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've driven on it for 3 winters and in my opinion, the tire is not worth its money. I always considered Nokian to be the best winter tire, but here I was disappointed. It doesn't perform very well in deep snow, and it also handles ice poorly in my opinion. The skidding is unpredictable. But the most important and annoying thing is that it is phenomenally sensitive to the incline of the road and other irregularities, such as an icy edge of a
- Vehicle:
- Ford Ranger 5 lugs 3,0L 1983-1992
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Excellent tires, drove two winters, tires like new.
The tires are excellent, on ice from the traffic light I'm always the first to leave. I've been driving on them for two winters already, no signs of wear, all the studs are in place.
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Not suitable for city driving.
I drove on it for 1 season in the city. Lost a few studs in the front, but often scraped the asphalt from traffic lights and when braking. At first, the tire performed excellently, excellent traction on both ice and snow, and clean asphalt was not a problem. It coped worse with snowy porridge, but only when braking (the directed pattern is noticeable). The only drawback was the howling of the studs, which even music could
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
One person writes comments, almost everything is repeated...
- Vehicle:
- Alfa Romeo 166
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Course stability
- Drive comfort
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability