Tyre reviews Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5. Страница 9 368

  • Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5
    Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

Статистика отзывов на шины Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5 пользователями сайта: 4.53 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5: 368 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 772
  • Место в рейтинге (шипованные): 105
Control on a dry road
Braking on dry roads
Steering in the wet
Braking on wet roads
Control in the snow
Control on ice
Control on dirt
Drive comfort
Internal noise
Quiet in motion
Rate
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price/performance
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5 по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
4%
2
5%
3
4%
4
39%
5
48%
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
    Rate
    4

    Very nice tire, everything is fine except for the howl of the studs at high speed, otherwise there are no complaints about the tire.

    Vehicle:
    Subaru Forester
    Size:
    225/60 R17 103T XL
    Buy again?:
    Most likely
    City:
    Кызыл
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    Rate
    3.7

    Disadvantages: - Too expensive for our production or brand money; - First winter until after 7 studs did not appear on each tire after 4,000 km run; - Ditches small groove in the asphalt to the inside; - Small stones tend to live in the tread; - Does not pass over a screw.

    On the fourth winter with a small run did not suffice, the cord broke and two balloons became helicopters, began to look for 2 wheels to

    Vehicle:
    SsangYong Rodius  2,7L  2005-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    Rate
    4.1

    For three seasons, I've lost about 3-5 studs on each tire. Very noisy, especially noticeable on cars with poor soundproofing. Big braking distance on asphalt.

    Vehicle:
    Mitsubishi RVR  1,8L  1992-1998
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    Rate
    4.7

    Great tire! Got it with the car, already worn out, but it's performing amazingly! Low noise level for studs! I'm thinking I'll sell it and make some profit! But I'll be riding on Pirelli ATR in the winter, it's okay, and I'm done with paying those clumsy tire shop guys. If I wanted to buy studs, I would have bought Hakkapeliitta!

    Vehicle:
    Ford Explorer 2WD  4,0L  1991-1999
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    Rate
    2.9

    A tire with a three-star rating.
    Down to -5°C everything is fine, if lower you need to drive 15-20 km to warm it up, then the road (track) holds perfectly.
    When driving in the city, it's very bad, brakes terribly.
    In the winter, in the courtyards, couldn't overcome a 5cm snowbank from a stop.
    Before this, I had Kleber Kapnor5

    Vehicle:
    Volvo 960  2,9L  1990-1996
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    Rate
    2.4

    I bought the tire 4 days ago, and after installing it, the next day the tire went flat. At the authorized center, they found a crack (or puncture) from the inside of the tire and refused to replace it, citing repairability. It's very disappointing to have paid 11,000 rubles for a tire and ride on a "new" tire with patches. I won't buy another tire like this and wouldn't recommend it to anyone.

    Vehicle:
    Kia Sorento  3,5L  2003-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    Rate
    3

    I've driven on it for 3 winters and in my opinion, the tire is not worth its money. I always considered Nokian to be the best winter tire, but here I was disappointed. It doesn't perform very well in deep snow, and it also handles ice poorly in my opinion. The skidding is unpredictable. But the most important and annoying thing is that it is phenomenally sensitive to the incline of the road and other irregularities, such as an icy edge of a

    Vehicle:
    Ford Ranger 5 lugs  3,0L  1983-1992
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    Rate
    4

    Excellent tires, drove two winters, tires like new.

    The tires are excellent, on ice from the traffic light I'm always the first to leave. I've been driving on them for two winters already, no signs of wear, all the studs are in place.

    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Control on dirt
    Quiet in motion
    Rate
    Wearability
    Price/performance
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    Rate
    3.4

    Not suitable for city driving.

    I drove on it for 1 season in the city. Lost a few studs in the front, but often scraped the asphalt from traffic lights and when braking. At first, the tire performed excellently, excellent traction on both ice and snow, and clean asphalt was not a problem. It coped worse with snowy porridge, but only when braking (the directed pattern is noticeable). The only drawback was the howling of the studs, which even music could

    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Control on dirt
    Quiet in motion
    Rate
    Wearability
    Price/performance
  • about tyre Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5

    Rate
    5

    One person writes comments, almost everything is repeated...

    Vehicle:
    Alfa Romeo 166
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Control in the snow
    Control on ice
    Course stability
    Drive comfort
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability