Tyre reviews Continental ContiWinterViking 2. Page 2 96

The best winter tire!

The noise on the asphalt is small. The road is held perfectly, regardless of the coverage, the car is very easy to handle, allows any maneuvers. In extreme modes (on ice, snow in a turn) the skid limit is clearly felt, the drift is manageable. I drove 25,000 km for the winter on harsh Siberian roads - with pleasure!!! True, I lost a few studs. I'm satisfied and I recommend it to everyone.<

Good tires

I took them for the winter, good tires. I live near Kiev, there's not much snow and ice, but I took studded tires anyway, since if there's ice, it's very slippery. At high speed, they hold the road perfectly, but slightly understeer, on snow and ice they behave perfectly, but on wet and dry asphalt at low speeds they are quite noisy, but I'm not complaining, by the way, braking on wet asphalt is very

A delight, not a tire!

I bought it consciously and don't regret it at all. At first, they didn't impress me much, but after running in for 200 km, everything fell into place. They grip any surface (believe me, I have something to compare with). There is very little noise, which is very significant for the Focus with its poor sound insulation. For comparison, Pirelli Winter Carving or Hakkapeliitta 5 make such a noise

Excellent tires!!!

Suitable for a tuned Lada, the only downside is that the studs come off. With my driving style, they last a maximum of 3 seasons. Holds the car on icy-snowy road at 140-160. When changing lanes or overtaking at 140, it slightly loses the rear end.

Satisfied 100%

Previously, I used Gislaved Nord Frost-3 for four(!) seasons... I really liked it... I was looking for the same one for my new car, but unfortunately, it's already discontinued.. :-((( I had to look for another tire... I found Conti... I'm not disappointed with my choice, on the contrary, I'm very happy with it... On all surfaces, at any temperature, at any speed - EVERYTHING is perfectly

Very pleased with the tires

Installed on a new car. Previously, it was mainly Hakkas. On the last car (1st generation Outlander) I had 5 Hakkas. I agree with those who compared them before me, the noise from the studs on Conti is much less than on Hakkas. I've driven 10-12 thousand kilometers on these tires in Moscow and the Moscow region... the tires always pleased me, in any weather and on any surface. I

Money down the drain!

When I bought it, I drove it properly for about 1000km, mostly not exceeding 80km/h (I was too ashamed to drive so slowly on the highway). Then I tried not to drive over 120-130km/h for a long time. Over one incomplete season, about 30-40 studs fell out of one front wheel, about 10 from the other, and the rear ones I haven't checked in detail yet, but they

3 winters and a summer on the Turan. Satisfied. Had a Gislaved before, won't buy another. Wanted to buy the same, but unfortunately can't find the size 205-60-16.

Quiet tire, but after one season on the front axle of the car there are 30 damaged studs. Rear axle is in order. Driven without fanaticism and wheelspin. Size 215 60 16. Won't take that kind of crap again.

225/60/16 For the money it could be better. Bad handling in corners, starts to slide in snow, and forget about off-road capable tyres. Before I had the first-generation Viking tyres from them, which were much more useful.