Tyre reviews Continental ContiIceContact 2. Page 41 948

Dear fellow motorists, I bought tires in November 2017. I drove two seasons. The driving style was active, without fanaticism. I had previously driven for almost 7 years (since 2011) on Continental ContiIceContact (about this there is my review on this site). I won’t go into the details of the charms and disadvantages, I will describe the difference right away. The tires are softer, and very quiet, you immediately notice this. The technology of the stud

Great tires, very quiet. Hold the turn well and brake well. My previous non-treaded Continental Viking Contact 6 don't compare. Two different tires.

I didn't test traction on deep snow. Other winter driving issues were no problem. Can't assess wear durability and aquaplaning.

Perfect tire!
Grips very well, road holds in any condition, at -45 won't freeze up, predictable in drift, doesn't lose control at high speeds.
The most important thing - extremely durable tread.

Excellent tires. Great handling and traction. They grip like a tractor.

There are some comments on handling on ice and small groove (track marks on the road). Comments, just comments. Otherwise, everything is super.

Previously, a Gislaved NF100 was in use. If the Conti is rated 4+ (nearly 5), then the Gislaved is no more than a 3.

These tires continue to grip the soft snow till the very end, until the car sits on its belly, and even if you get stuck in the snow, you might still be able to exit.

On the comfort of the highway, and city noise is almost imperceptible, compared to the hakka7, 8, the steering has become light, but on the highway, it is not as informative as I would have liked, especially on black ice, the car behaves unpredictably

Holds the road well. Fluffy snow goes by without a hitch. Slightly noisy. Overall satisfied.

Good winter tire!

All is well!