Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka i3 421

Good tyres for a slightly above average price.
Tread depth: 5000 km.
Driven both on highway and in city.
Pluses: good handling on dry roads, good braking, keeps the road well.
Minuses: a bit noisy and harsh on poor asphalt.
Overall: good tyres, recommended.

Excellent tires, just super!

I was choosing for a very long time, read everything I could about everything, and my choice fell on Nokian Hakka I3 175/70/R 13. I took 2 balloons for the front VAZ 21099, previously Belshina was installed, I noticed the difference from the first meter, the car became softer, quieter, wheel slippage is almost none, by the way, the steering wheel also became softer,

GO№NO

does not hold the road, the car floats, and there is no softness. on a wet road, it's hard to start without skidding. in turns, it skids, it's good that it doesn't make too much noise, wears out quickly. and the speed index.

Excellent quality for little money

I bought for Honda Fit to replace Yokohama A10A, which passed without any issues, both in summer and winter, 57 thousand kilometers and still 4 mm left, although the sides were worn down to 0.5 mm (I advise you, if you see Yokohama A10A, take this tire and forget about it until it wears out). I use my car every day and all year round. I will provide comparisons between

Excellent tires

Wonderful quiet tires, hold great, attempts to start with wheel spin lead to nothing, even on wet asphalt. After 3 thousand miles of mileage, the eighth (wear indicator) has not disappeared.

In general, it's worth the money 100%.

I replaced the tires with Nokian, 400 hryvnia per wheel, of course, it was expensive, but for a car, first and foremost, it's the brakes and tires. Previously, I had a used all-season tire from Germany, which was already 10 years old (this was discovered after the purchase), the tire aging process had its consequences, dry road was so-so, wet road was a disaster

Excellent tires

VW Passat B4 car. Three years ago, I was looking for tires for the front axle, I chose for a long time. I stopped at Hakka i3. The pattern was liked, and the price is excellent. The only thing that puzzled me was that it was made in Russia, I was very worried about the quality. But after the first trip, I immediately noticed that the car became softer and the noise decreased significantly (before that, I had Good

I didn't read other reviews. I'll write this one and compare. I chose tires for the Mazda, considering the weak sound insulation of the last one and the hard suspension. The main requirements, accordingly, were low noise and softness without compromising on handling and reliability. I guess I guessed it. The tire is indeed soft, but not very aggressive. It behaves well in the rain and the first snow. It writes well in turns. The sporty Dunlop, of course, allowed for

I've driven on these tires for 4 seasons, roughly 50,000 km. They handle the road very well, both dry and wet. I've never tested them on ice and snow, as I switch to winter tires for the winter. The wear resistance is excellent - I can still see 7 threads! The noise level is generally lower than domestic tires, but comparable to another import. The tire is made in Russia, and I bought it almost at the beginning of its production, one

185/60/14 60 profile tire has a low profile at 2 atm and looks deflated. It's easy to get a blowout. Even on the MKAD in a barely noticeable groove, it pulls the steering and takes the car off course. In general, I didn't relax. On the seams and cracks, it slaps loudly. On the gravel-covered surface, it whines and vibrates like a studded tire. I expected more from this tire