Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka i3. Page 6 421

Killer tires

I have a VAZ-21124, I was driving on "Rosava" as it was installed at the factory. Impossible to balance. Alignment and geometry made the car steer to the right and then to the left. At the service station, as soon as I replaced it with Hakka i3, I let go of the wheel and was amazed - the car drives straight. Wear is excellent, I've driven over 30,000 km and the wear is less

Not bad tires for the money

In general, the tires are good, they hold the road perfectly on both dry and wet asphalt, there is not even a hint of aquaplaning, very quiet. On dirt, it passes through average. I drove twice on wet snow and snow slush - without complaints, if you drive calmly. Of the minuses, I noted an increased fuel consumption with the same driving style - consumption increased from 8 to 9.5 liters. I

medium

replaced the standard amtel planet ds with nokia i3. after amtel, the tire seemed like a paradise - handling improved significantly, braking distance decreased significantly, on a wet road i felt calm, cruising speed of 160 by gps did not cause even the slightest discomfort. the drawbacks were revealed later - this is, first of all, wear resistance. it is simply low, tires wear out in no time. of course, i don't drive that little, but the

Good tires for a reasonable price

I bought 2 in the spring for the driving wheels - the impressions are exclusively positive! It behaves well at speed in dry and wet weather (up to 160 km, didn't drive more). The braking distance is quite adequate. For the next summer, I will buy for the rear wheels. I won't write about noise, so as not to mislead - the car itself is quite noisy. In general, excellent tires from the budget ones!

The tires are simply super
I'm very pleased with the tires, to be honest, I've changed tires a lot over the past 3 years, two sets of Fulda used to be enough for me for a year, until I installed NOKIAN and remained pleased. I constantly drive aggressively and take turns at high speed))))))
Pros: Good grip on wet roads
Cons: didn't notice any

Good rubber!

I bought it because previously I had the infamous BC11 on my car and it spun me around 180 degrees at a speed of about 35-40 km/h in relatively dry weather. Now, about the main thing: the tire fully justifies its price. After changing the tires, I noticed how much the rolling increased and the noise decreased. On a wet road, it holds up well and there are no hints of skidding (I tried it on purpose). It

The tire is normal! Reliable, if not too radical =)

At first, it didn't really impress me, but after 10,000 kilometers, you start to understand its reliability! If you nitpick, it's not immediately comfortable after Bridgestone, as it's softer - I even thought it was too soft at first... When my Lanos is giving it a hard time, it likes to gently squeal and, despite good handling, the tire wears out faster than I

Everything is fine except for the quality of manufacture, it's complete garbage, the first bulge appeared after a week, and after a month they appeared even on the rear wheels, I do not recommend them to anyone, exchange is impossible, the store refused to replace them, and the support website and hotline phone say it's possibly a one-time case, don't believe the advertisement!!!

The tires (in my opinion) are very good. I've driven them for three seasons. The fourth season is now underway. It handles the road perfectly, the brakes and aquaplaning are 5 points. The fact that it's noisy is not a problem with the tires, but with the car's sound insulation. The tread indicator is still slightly visible at 4, on others it's already at 3. If I have to change them in the middle of summer, I'll

Initially, it was on a car with a 95 index!!!!, a clear mismatch in weight for a 5-door hatchback, with a fully loaded car it's still tolerable, but when there's only one or two people in the car, you have to artificially lower the tire pressure, the rubber is just wooden!!!