Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka i3. Page 5 421

Excellent tires for very reasonable money.

Excellent rubber. Not once did it give reason to doubt the correctness of the choice. Well dampens small bumps and irregularities, does not float in turns. The noise level is moderate - depends on the asphalt coating.

Good tires! I like how they hum,

In the first hours after purchase, I had to drive over stones and rails. At night, I was returning home and flew into a pit with the left side until it knocked, I thought "it's over" no cuts or bulges. At 130-140 km, I feel the road confidently, I haven't accelerated faster yet, maybe I didn't notice. Braking is good. I'm satisfied with the tires. I think

Average tire, too soft sidewall

I bought it on the recommendation of the store's sellers. After 2 days - the first sidewall puncture. The situation is usual - a pit on the road, at a speed of about 70 km/h. For two summer seasons - I fixed 12 sidewall cuts, on the winter set of Bridgestone - not a single one for the same period. The front tires were heavily worn out - to a level of 2 mm

Excellent tires for their price
Excellent tires for their price. Low-noise on any coatings. Behaves excellently at high speeds. When entering turns, the car became much more stable. On wet roads, it also behaves very decently. With braking, everything is also in order. The car really changed for the better after buying these tires. The only thing - it's very soft, probably the wear will be very large.
Pros: Low-noise, high-speed

G....
I bought 4 tires. All 4 have "stitches" on the inner and outer sides. Beyond GOST standards. Almost immediately, radial runout occurred while driving. A lot of weights were needed during balancing. I "clashed" with the seller. We agreed to replace them. I will be getting Michelin Energy Saver.
Pros: tread
Cons: "stitches", runout.

Simply the best....

175/70R13, VAZ 2112, tire mileage 12000 km, tried many - stopped at this model, on all parameters - 5 points, in the rain + speed, + keeps the turn trajectory, + fantastic brakes.

Expected better (i.e. slightly above average)

Compared to the previously used Michelin MHT and Matador MP12, these take an intermediate position. The old good Michelin made in Europe was better in all respects. The disadvantages of Nokian include: 1) FLOAT on the highway after 120-130 km/h, 2) wear out faster than desired, 3) noisy and hard (at a pressure of 2.2). Advantages compared to

Normal tire, but there are some issues
Normal tire, but there are some issues, after 5000 km bumps appeared, so far acceptable but unpleasant. My rating is good. Last year I drove on Michelin, they are definitely better, but also more expensive. These are more budget-friendly, I was just limited in funds at the time of purchase, otherwise I would have bought only Michelin.
Pros: Quiet, good grip, inexpensive
Cons: Bumps appeared

Soft, low-noise, economical, for lovers of quiet driving

Nissan Bluebird car in 14th body. Previously installed Maxrun Excela Me 2. Nokian is much softer (sidewalls) turns can't be passed so sharply. At high speeds (over 150 km/h) any maneuvering leaves unpleasant sensations. Too soft. Feels like the rear of the car is lagging behind.

Excellent tires, haven't had the best to ride on!

Very satisfied with all criteria, on dry asphalt they literally grip the turns, there's no aquaplaning at all, and most importantly, wear resistance is top-notch! I recommend them to everyone!