Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka i3. Page 7 421

I've installed them on the front so far, previously had Belshina 391, after installation, the directional stability is great, it absorbs bumps more softly, but brakes worse, however, if you turn, the noise couldn't be determined because Belshina 391 is even noisier and there were no better tires, what also struck me was the responsiveness and lightness of the steering wheel, it moves so that the manageability of the suspension is generally excellent...

Overall impressions are very positive: the tire is quite soft, moderately comfortable (noise and hum!), excellent road holding, and excellent braking performance. I have checked aquaplaning a couple of times - it goes like a tank. Minus: it wears out fairly quickly + a bit noisy.

I'm giving it a bold 0!
Extremely dissatisfied.
Although made in Finland!
It's noisy, wears down extremely quickly, and is poorly balanced.
After 2 years the tyre has been completely used up: 2 tyres cracked - one on the tread and the other on the sidewall.
One tyre also had a cord bulge and the tyre was noticeably bent!
The steering wheel was really loose - I couldn't figure

Satisfied

Replaced 2 weeks ago, so far the mileage is just under 1,000 km. Very pleased with the tires, they handle great in turns; in heavy rain when turning at around 10 degrees at a speed of about 90, there's not even a hint of hydroplaning, let's see how they'll behave in the hot summer. As already mentioned, they balance perfectly. Better Finnish-Russian Nokian than Polish Fulda.

Pros:

I was given two sets of tires (8 tires). I'm satisfied.
I'm satisfied not only with the fact that I got the tires for free, but also with the quality of the ride.

It handles the road very well in the rain and when cornering.
Pros: Ideal in the rain
Cons: No rim protection strip

Great tires!!!
I don't know why some people say it's not very good tires. Personally, I think that for the price and quality, there is no better option on the market. And as evidence of my words, for those who want, look at this link and you will all understand!!! http://www.autocentre.ua/ac/Service/Expert/14608.html#akocomment3133
Pros: All the advantages of summer tires are present
Cons

I've been choosing between Michlen, Fulda and Nokia for a long time, but considering the price, quality and service, I chose this tire.

The impression after 40,000 km on Amtel (factory) on our roads and replacement with Nokia i3 is impressive and can be felt immediately after leaving the tire shop. My 21104 has turned into a sticky aggressive car.

On the highway at a speed of 130-150 km/h, the tire

Very weak sidewalls. After 5000 km, a bulge appeared. When accidentally touching an unnoticed curb in the dark at a low speed, a significant sidewall cut on two tires. Resistance to uneven road surfaces is mediocre, somewhat noisy. Not worth the money.

I have driven on the tires for one and a half summer seasons and 1 month in the snow.