Tyre reviews Nokian W. Page 5 177

super, price-quality
I've driven 2 winters (2006-2007, 2007-2008) with no issues. It handles snow superbly, and holds great on the highway. I sold the car with the tires for the season, I think they still have some life left. Now I'm choosing tires for my new car and I'll buy the same ones (I'll repeat, after all) for the price-quality.
Pros: excellent tires for

Soft, quiet

Ran for 2 seasons. Almost no wear. Very soft, goes well on snow and asphalt, even great. Does not lead anywhere (after reading reviews, I was surprised). A friend ran 1 winter on a Lanos on the same ones (on my recommendation) - very pleased.

Good tires, excellent grip, combined with quality

Installed on Lanos, after summer tires the car pulls to the right, before that it didn't, did wheel alignment (although after the TO2 the car passed 3 thousand km), at good mechanics, still pulls to the right, changed wheels, pulls to the right, everyone says it's a peculiarity of the tires in this size, advise what to do, and the tires are good otherwise.

Pros:

Okay

I took the tires for Lanos 1757013, after Rosava BC20, which was completely worn out, Nokian seemed harder, although after reading reviews, people write that it's soft, maybe there's something even harder? I don't know... Except for the hardness, I have nothing bad to say, it doesn't lead anywhere, water - good. Snow, ice - haven't tried yet. For 290 грн - so far satisfied, when I try

There is a certain percentage of defects

Only after buying and installing, the car started to pull to the right. Checked the camber-toe - the result is the same. Dismantled and swapped (right to left, left to right). It started to pull to the left. "Took off" the car, checked the wheels. Almost perfect ones were put on the front (front-wheel drive) and again swapped the tires. The car again started to pull to the right

I installed it on the front-wheel drive and I'm satisfied.

I was choosing between Fulda Kristall Montero and Nokian W. I stopped at Nokian W, although everyone I asked leaned towards Fulda. Impressions: On mud - excellent, on snow - super, on ice - not good... I found the reason - the tire pressure was 1.9, I made it 1.8. The situation on ice changed dramatically, it started to hold

Really pulls to the right

I put on the tires not so long ago. I haven't driven on snow and ice yet. But it pulls to the right specifically, before replacing the car didn't pull anywhere, and it's new, only 6700km. I read the comments and realized that the problem is with the tire's sidewall. Previously, on another Skoda, I had Fulda Cristal Montero 185/60/14 - it doesn't pull anywhere,

So far, I'm satisfied

I haven't been driving on them for long, but there was already snow and ice in Kiev. The behavior of the tire pleased me. The wheel and the car don't pull or lead anywhere. I have 165/70 R13 tires. I managed to test them on a snow-covered site. They perform well. They grip perfectly. At a speed of 90-100 km/h when turning, they practically don't drift. The noise is not

It hums quietly with a pleasant sound, and handles the road well

For those who drift to the right or left, the optimal pressure is 1.8, not 1.9. On wet and rolled snow, ice, without ABS, it is necessary to slow down gradually, it was pleasantly surprising that on ice it behaves very confidently. For those who wear it in winter conditions, if the car is already skidding, then it doesn't matter what tires you have, but

Excellent!!!

VAZ 21099, when I bought these tires, I was surprised why there was a 60 UAH difference with the same ones - the seller said it was because they were made in Slovakia. I have a Finka - excellent, soft, quiet (last year I had Amtele NordMaster - AWFUL!!!) These ones drift a bit in turns at positive temperatures and make a bit of noise on wet roads at low speeds (up to 50),