Tyre reviews Nokian Hakkapeliitta 7. Page 9 730

Good tire, am completely satisfied with it. Exploiting the given model on the second car, no complaints. The only minus is not so much the tire size of 235x45 R17, but our roads. Very low profile, will change.

Bought the Hakkapeliitta for my wife's car as she transports the kids, so only the Hakkapeliitta, before that 4 seasons (winter) was a 5 model, they were very satisfied with it, the 8th model is expensive, and the 7th one is not cheap either, but it fully justifies its price, this winter we had a lot of icy black ice until the end of March, and the Hakkapeliitta 7 performed at

I have to say the tire is very good, drove on a Nissan Qashqai with Nokian 7 and it handled the road extremely well, whether on ice, snow, or entering turns without hesitation. Now I have a Nissan Murano with Nokian 8 and it's a letdown compared to the 7 and much worse. Those who drive on 8 will understand me. In my opinion, the 7 is a much better tire than the 8.

Excellent tire, I recommend to all who want guaranteed reliability, not empty words! Most importantly, no fanaticism, because miracles don't happen and the laws of physics haven't been abolished! I've already driven 30,000 km, only 3 studs have blown out on all four wheels in two seasons. A constant four-wheel drive preserves the tire and helps with handling, so I judge this tire appropriately for my vehicle. I wouldn't have regretted the money spent! I would recommend it

After Gislaved Winter tire "Land and Sky", the new "Silent and Stable" became quiet and stable during motion. Does not spin on snow. Does not whine on dry, gets out of icy prison on the first try even uphill. But it's way too expensive!!!

Dry road: Tendency to slip when accelerating sharply. No complaints in the snow. Braking on dry asphalt can lead to a spin. On a quiet drive and long distances outside the city, cracks appear around the studs on the front axle from the 10th trip, and they start to wear out from the 20th trip. Can "get stuck" when entering a puddle at a speed above 50 km/h. The price is never justified, you'll be giving it away for

The tire is run on a 2011 Toyota Camry 40. The tire really does save on fuel. Quiet ride. Wear at 80,000 km is minimal, most tread is still in place. It handles wet roads at 80-90 km/h with confidence, at higher speeds it can hydroplane. It'll plow through deep snow with confidence, until it gets stuck on its side. On dry pavement it's soft, like any winter tire. It doesn't like mud

These tires are used on Toyota Tundra 5.7, Toyota FJ Cruiser. Excellent road behavior on packed ice, snow fields, and drifts up to 20-25 cm. Tundra with this tire also perfectly trims the way, without slipping and crawling. Tundra with this tire passed around 50,000 km, driving carefully, from 4 wheels 5 studs came out. The state of the wheels after such a run is satisfactory, if not for the Kamchat

The best tires I've had in the winter so far. They have a little slip in sharp turns, but it's all under control. Finally, there's a fuel economy in the winter. Tires are soft and comfortable. Worth the money. They say they're completely worn out and the studs are flying off - drivers + rearranging them to even out the wear. I've been in the tire business, and I've never seen winter tires like these. It was a choice between non-st

Bad fit on the rim, first winter was fairly decent, the studs were worn down and cracked but without any loss. The second winter the studs fell off, the tire is unbalanced, it's bouncing and yawing when driving. It's become a standard studless tire, the lug is missing. The third season it got three blowouts after summer replacement! It doesn't collect potholes sometimes on the track190. I went crazy and switched to Continental IceContact. The difference in comfort