Tyre reviews Nokian Hakkapeliitta 7. Page 10 730

I won't go into all the details about the numerous advantages, as opinions are already plenty. I just wanted to join in and say that in my opinion, Hakkapeliitta is the best winter tire. My old Toyota has Hakkapeliitta 5's mounted on it since 2007, and it spends 7 months a year on asphalt, so it's basically got a few seasons left in it, I'd say. On my previous car, a Honda, I used Hakkap

Bought from Finland (Finns tires) - by the way, it cost me only 105 euros per tire back in 2010, in St. Petersburg at the time it cost around 16,000 rubles, i.e. twice as expensive. Now in 2013 - 120 euros without invoice (+24% with invoice) and our tire, even in the Finke-made in Russia, 215/65 R16. Did not lose a single stud in three seasons

Compared to the Michelin X-Ice Nord 1, Nokian tyres showed themselves worse.
Worse handling.
Cuts into the snow badly.
Gets stuck.
Was stuck this winter where Michelin had no problem driving through.
Not happy with the tyre for the price I paid. Will sell the Hakkapeliitta 7 with the car, next time will buy Michelin.

Solaris car, May 2012. The tires did not justify themselves, the price is greatly overestimated for its characteristics. It floats in slush, snow mash. I drove from Yekaterinburg to Tyumen on a freshly fallen snow, to drive above 80 km/h was simply dangerous, the car was swept away when exiting a turn, the rear always swung towards oncoming traffic. I almost decided to sell the car, blamed the Solaris suspension. After reading the reviews

I drive on this terrible tire from winter 2012/13 on a 3-liter Captiva 2012. Before that, I had a Haka 5 on a Lascah and 2 years on a turbo forerunner equipped with a Conti Winterhawk 2. The car drives on dry roads like it's got a lag, you turn the steering wheel and then the car responds. It completely loses traction on a road that's been lightly covered in snow, it's

This tire is simply super! The tire perfectly lives up to its price. On any road, be it snow, slush or ice, it behaves simply great in even the most extreme weather conditions!!! It brakes perfectly, the car stops as if rooted to the spot and doesn't even vibrate! The only minus of this tire is the noise. It's very loud. However, I think that's acceptable for a studded tire. In general, the tire is simply super! If you are

Svetlana on Suzuki Ignis 1.3TD
You are just a terrible driver. You don't know how to drive. For how much did you buy your license, an idiot? Everyone around you is driving by on BC tires, and you are blaming your husband Misha...
What a pair of friends who are driving with such idiots.................

Good tire, liked it primarily for effective braking, fuel consumption did not increase, true starts from a stand on ice not very well, with skidding, but this is when almost clean ice, confidently goes on snow. Put in the peak of frost and ice, rode to spring, to warm, and not regretted once. Naturally, I was breaking in. Noise is acceptable: quietly goes on snow, well, on clean asphalt it reminds itself, but not critically. Was R13, sold

Riding on the 7. Good tire, holds up great! The Kamaz was like that before, it constantly skidded on the ice and even on a small incline couldn't get up, really got tired of it. Got stuck in the snow a couple of times. But with the Nokian, it's easier to drive, good grip. Especially on an icy road, it grips better, I was even surprised. Goes well on snow too. Pretty quiet for its type

I bought a Nissan Prairie Joy in 2009, and when I sold the car, the winter tire was not needed by the buyer and I kept it. I put it on a Toyota FunCargo and drove for another season, and when I sold it, the same story repeated itself: the winter tire was not needed by the buyer. The next season, the tire was on a Toyota Vitz Ardeo. The tire was on the cars from October to the end of May because the winters are