Tyre reviews Nokian Hakkapeliitta 4 144
- Rate
The tires are awesome!!!
Everyone who didn't like these tires either doesn't understand them or is talking nonsense... 10,000 miles driven, only 1 stud came out. Wear - 0 mm! Noise? What noise? It's not there! What else do you need? Maybe you just bought a cheap one???
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
I don't mind the noise - when I want quiet, I lie in bed in the bedroom and enjoy it. The tyre has passed three winters, a couple of studs fell off the front, minimal wear became noticeable only after the third winter, after the first there was nothing to see, although as a rule, almost the whole of November, December and March, plus half of April, you drive on bare asphalt as the weather is unclear. Snow and ice don't frighten me, complete confidence
- Vehicle:
- VAZ 2114 1.5L 2001-2008
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Wow
I never thought that in winter you can drive calmly and not be afraid. In modes: start - brake, the tires are just great, especially on loose snow and snow crust, on ice, of course, it slips, but with the correct operation of the clutch and gas pedals, as well as the brake, the car behaves predictably. I bought them without studs and I advise everyone to do the same, there is no noise at all in all driving modes. Over 2
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
Not for Moscow winters, I think!
I bought 4 tires with a 13-inch radius at the beginning of winter, if it can be called that, because I consider a 13-stud tire to be the most optimal option for winter! It confidently handles any snowbank, slush, or rut! It's noisy on asphalt, I can probably find it on the road by the sound) Next time, I'll only buy studded tires, since I mostly drive in the
Awesome tire
I was torn between Hakkep4 and Hakkep R (new non-studded model) for a long time. We have winters that are unpredictable, with rain in the morning and icy fields in the evening, 30cm of snow, or -5 degrees and dry conditions. In short, during the winter of 2008/2009, we had only one month of snow and ice, but I don't regret choosing the fourth model for a second. Yes
- Rate
BMW 325 E 90
I drive an automatic, and I generally consider Nokian to be the best winter tire for Russian roads, with this tire I can drive 200 km/h on the MKAD and still feel safe, and even when there's a lot of snow and ice, I'm generally satisfied with the tire:)
Pros: super
Cons: none- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Control on dirt
- Quiet in motion
- Rate
- Wearability
- Price/performance
- Rate
Extremely satisfied! Finnish production.
After five years of use, not a single lost lug, sold the set as new with the car. Excellent quality as regards both cornering stability and braking efficiency.
A bit noisy, but everything on such a car is noisy.
Too bad that Finnish quality is hard to find at the moment.- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Aveo 1,2L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Great tire for the Russian winter. Went into the third season and it's like new, almost all the studs are still in place. Blinked only once last winter and that was due to my own carelessness. Was previously on a Goodyear 500 and a Dunlop Graspic studdable. Conclusion - the Nokian winter tire is absolute 100% king.
- Vehicle:
- Mazda 3 1,6L 2003-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I'm very satisfied with the tire. Last winter I drove on a Cordiant Snow Max, which has a design similar to the Hakkapeliitta, and now I'm driving on a Hakkapeliitta 4, so I can compare. The Cordiant only outperforms in terms of off-road capabilities. The Hakkapeliitta is good in snow, but the Cordiant is even better. However, when braking, I feel more confident, and the ABS system is less prone to
- Vehicle:
- VAZ Priora (2170) 1.5L 2007-2009
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
UNBEATABLE! Three winters, at least two more minimum. "Killed" two disks (dented in the scrap, one had to drive 100-150 meters on a disk. Held up, no cracks!). By the way, made in Vsevolozhsk, didn't even expect it. All studs are still in place, although not as high as they used to be. Brakes well. Whispers - yes. And how do you want studs to sound like
- Vehicle:
- Daewoo Nexia 1,5L 1995-2000
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability