Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka Green. Page 7 405

It feels like I'm driving on different tyres based on the reviews. The tyre in general is nice on the 2110 175/65/14, it handles the road well and brakes well, but there is one major drawback that spoils everything - fast wear. I've driven 8,500 km in 2 months and on the front wheels the number 4 (half of the tread is gone) is barely visible, and it's not even July yet. I wouldn't take

Before this, the car had Kamaz tires which were left by the previous owner. They were to be replaced this year as the car is used as a work vehicle 99.9% of the time in the city. I read a lot of reviews and was between Turanza and Green. My father-in-law has Turanza, and I found it very noisy. I thought the tire was a hardwood, so I did not take a bridge, but it's the asphalt, very noisy on any

The tire is worth its price. On a normal tread, acoustic comfort is normal. On ice, the car’s behavior is predictable (if not a little wild). On mud, it grips reasonably well. There is a minimal tendency to aquaplane. The only minus is that it is loud if the asphalt is coarse-grained. Worth buying!

Nokian Hakka Green R16 205/60 on my Mercedes.

Everything is fine. I replaced the old (5 years old) worn-out Michelin Energy, which had become stiff and noisy. After the Hakka, it's clear that it's softer (especially on small bumps) and more comfortable. It handles well, there's almost no noise (on a smooth asphalt), I even remembered what brakes feel like, the balancing was normal (taking into account the worn-out

I installed a week ago and the first impressions are: it holds its line extremely well, it swallows small irregularities, but it irritates with a small noise. A friend of mine says that after break-in it disappears, and it started with him too. The biggest minus is that when you drive on gravel with small pebbles, the whole tire is simply littered with them, and as you exit onto asphalt, they begin to ring like studs, most of all it kills to dig

Good tire, holds track well, corners great, on straight road it rides like on rails. Plus one-year warranty. Who says all-season tires are just for the US? But for summer tires, they need to be harder. Who says it's not balanced, change the wheels or the balancer? Not a single complaint about balancing since the start of the season.

I bought these in spring 205/55/16 for my Ford Focus 1.8. Before that I used Continental SportContact2. I took Nokian Green almost blindly: I only had free time during holidays and nothing was available from specialty centres, so I bought them in Epicentre from whatever was available from the brands... If I put it briefly, the tyres exceeded my expectations. The only drawback is some noisiness, of course not as much as on the winter "sl

Great tire! I wanted to buy a Continental, but they offered me this one for 3400 roubles per wheel in size 205 55 16 and I decided to take it. It's completely quiet, it grips the asphalt perfectly, and it's a pleasure to enter turns at high speed. I waited for a week for the rain, so I could test it on flooded roads. The rain came and I went on a trip across the city, I turned on the rear

After reading reviews from car owners who have purchased the Haku Green, it seems that the tire is shipped from different factories. 15 195/65. Purchased and started using in late March (there were still ice patches around). I immediately noticed a higher noise level compared to the winter Yokohama ice GUARD. The standard summer Aspec Yokohama also made less noise. By traction, it outperforms all, the ads about fuel efficiency are not lying. Good traction with

205-60-R16 is noisy, but acceptable (as long as it's not hot), on a wet road it behaves confidently (I tested it in the rain on a stadium), it swallows road irregularities (the suspension only fine-tunes the ride), it keeps the set trajectory accurately, I drove on it with freezing temperatures on snow, it performed decently (but it was almost as loud as a winter tire), it requires balancing (for the second time after 800 km), let