Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka Green. Page 3 405

Summer tire, with two layers of tread depth, the digits 4 are visible, so it would still have served, but in the middle of this summer, cracks have appeared along the tread, on three, had to change the entire set (unfortunately), was used only on asphalt, careful driving, speed mode not more than 120 km/h, disappointed.

Honestly, I was expecting more, but... On a wet road it's "NOTHING". Wear from "6" to "3" after just one season, that's 15000 km (thank God for the indicator). Not worth the money.

Good tire, much quieter than Hancook Ventus Prime 2, softer and more comfortable.
It got much more comfortable to move on bad asphalt.
Very quiet.
It handles well at speeds up to 160.
If you don't drive aggressively, and make turns at adequate speeds, then everything is super.
By the way, on the Ceed JD, it fits the 205.60 R16 size without any problems, with a +

Good grip on the road, also holds up well in the rain. A bit noisy, but not too bad (2.4/5 on 55 profile). Overall, not bad handling qualities. Dislike the low mileage, max 25-30 thou km. Would not recommend this model, unless choosing between this tire and a tyre like it.

I'm very pleased with the tire. It handles well on both dry and wet roads! With my very aggressive driving style, it behaves perfectly! + Good durability!

Disappointed.
Only two positives - the tire rides very well in extremely cold weather. You can drive in November if there is no snow, i.e. the tire does not "freeze". And the tire is quite quiet and soft.
Otherwise, and mainly - minuses: handling is simply non-existent.

Purchased in 2015 in place of Michelin, they ran only 9000 miles in the season. Size 205/60R16. As a result: They showed very stiff at the beginning, but after 500 km the opinion changed. They drive well on the track in any weather. Braking is good. The weights balanced normally from 20 to 40 g.

Of course, it's not for winter or ice. When I bought them before, I didn't think there was a significant difference. On the highway, I immediately felt the difference. The road from the city to the village I go to is winding and hilly. So, on this road, I previously drove at 80 or 100 km/h. With these tires, I'm cruising at 120-140 km/h and I don't grip the steering wheel tightly, the directional stability is

Bad tires. This is because after about 30,000 km the tires started to crack along the grooves down to the metal cord - first one in about 3-4 months, then the other. At wear of about 50%. Other qualities are quite good - holds the road well and very soft at first couldn't complain, but the fact that you have to throw it away after half a year puts a cross on all its merits.

The first Hakka Green I got was a used one, 6 years old, and the rest were 7-year-olds, with some being 2-year-olds (each tire has a tread depth indicator and even a water drop symbol that shows when you can still drive on wet asphalt).

Despite having a low tread depth, the tire had excellent traction on both mountainous serpentine roads and flat asphalt. It handled well in the rain and covered around 60,000 km over