Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka Green. Page 4 405

The tire has a loud and stiff ride, and also gets floaty in puddles, but otherwise it's a very good tire. I'd recommend it in warmer climates. On dry asphalt, handling is top-notch, and durability is also quite good - on my previous set of tires, I used them for 3 seasons and around 60,000 km.

Pros: Excellent tread stability, nearly complete absence of aquaplaning. Pretty low noise level. Performs well on roads with variable climate conditions. Extended Nokia warranty.

Cons: Tires wear down quite quickly, though this is a price for the comfort and all the above mentioned features.

It's time for a tire change and the question is, what to choose? Col' s wheels for free advised Nokian Hakkapeliitta Green, and it's covered for a year, I asked friends about it - they say everything honestly, without cheating, if any damage occurs, they either replace or repair it! I've been driving on these tires for 4 months now, they are soft, comfortable, and don't float on water! Overall, I'm satisfied with both the

Did a 2.5 season on it. Learned it in and out. The tire is a great one, but it wears out quickly. About 45-50 thousand km and it's worn out. Used it without being too gentle, but not too harsh either. The driving style is more aggressive and active. Going on gravel was a breeze and I had no issues with getting back on the road. Apparently because I didn't read the reviews saying it's a hassle. Not as bad as

I put this tire 300 km ago on the front instead of the bald Rosava. First impression - very soft, it swallows small bumps like a dream. But I was happy only until the moment I accelerated to 60 km/h - it's a disaster, the sounds of a taking off fighter jet and accelerating electric train stop. Long trips on the highway are impossible, my head is square from the noise. The bald Rosava was much quieter.

185/60/14. Bought two years ago, mileage on these tires is 50,000, remaining tread depth is 4mm on the front axle, 5mm on the rear axle. Under such conditions, they should last for another 70-80 thousand. I'm very satisfied with the wheels and feel confident on any tread on both dry and wet surfaces. After the standard camber - it's like sitting in another car. I run 2.0 degrees around the circle

I was told not to buy this tyre, as it is manufactured in Russia. I didn't listen to the wise people and bought it. I've driven it for around 5,000 km, only on the asphalt, no dirt roads, and one of the tyres just burst (a crack of about 5-6 cm across the tyre), fortunately, the speed was low and I managed to stop in time. So, think twice before buying this tyre. I definitely won't be buying it

Tires not for our roads! Bought in May 2012, already changed 2 wheels - got bulges, another will come out. . . will throw it out, previously Michelin - not a single bulge in 3 years, I think the driving style and roads haven't changed much, just overhyped rubbish.

These noisy, hydroplaning tyres, which are supposed to be quiet in the cabin, super tyre, I didn't expect such a huge difference from the original, it's totally different, in winter after these I put a block and listen if it's driving or floating, I don't believe my ears - where's the roar? where's the noise? am I driving or floating, anyway, don't buy them, they don't know how to make anything in Russia, they ruin everything.

Hello. I'd like to share my unpleasant experience with "Nokian Green" tires. In 2012 I drove on Nokian Made in Russia and it was terrible. The noise in the car was so loud it was like all the bearings were squealing at the same time, I tried everything: swapping, balancing, even reprofiling, but nothing helped all summer. Of course, there is one plus - the non-wear rate, 50,000 km