Tyre reviews Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV. Страница 8 158
- Rate
- Rate
- Rate
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Simply the best! Expensive - I agree! There are cheaper options - I agree. For those who drive a lot and in different weather conditions, there are options to change to two or three such well-known brands. I won't advertise them. This is my third set of Continental tires - I won't change them for anything... unless I run out of money..)))
- Vehicle:
- Audi Q7
- Size:
- 285/40 R21 109Y XL_AO
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Good tires.
- Vehicle:
- Mercedes GLS-Class
- Size:
- 255/45 R19 100V
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Excellent
- Vehicle:
- Land Rover Discovery Sport
- Size:
- 235/55 R19 105W XL
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Moscow
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
The tires are good, soft, but a bit noisy
- Vehicle:
- Jaguar F-Pace
- Size:
- 255/60 R18 108Y
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Псков
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've been using them for 3 seasons with difficulty, at the beginning of the 3rd season the almost bald front tires had to be moved to the back, the rear tires had less wear. The main disadvantage is the stiffness of these tires, yes, when driving at high speeds, hitting curbs, and side impacts, this stiffness is a plus and there are no complaints, the tires handled it perfectly, but when there's even a small pothole on the road, the charm of this stiffness is nullified. Even the slightest unevenness is not compensated for, and considering the quality of our roads in the Moscow region, where potholes are the norm, driving a car on this tire is a torment. The car is thrown from side to side and comfort disappears completely. And this, in my opinion, is the main disadvantage. The second point is, of course, wear resistance. Three seasons for tires that cost 20k per tire is not the best result. For comparison, I had Hankook before, and they lasted 5 seasons with the same driving style. I don't want to buy this tire again.
- Vehicle:
- Kia Sportage
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Extremely rapid wear. Lasted only one season, won't make it through the summer. Average annual mileage 25,000.
- Vehicle:
- Audi Q5
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability


