Tyre reviews Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015. Page 6 1630
- Rate
I bought these tires for summer.
They handle, corner and brake well on dry asphalt. They swallow small potholes. There is almost no noise at high speeds.
The same on wet asphalt. I didn't notice aquaplaning.
They drive normally on wet ground. However, they fog up instantly in the mud.- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Niva
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Everything's fine, the tires we ordered are great. The managers shipped them quickly, despite the holidays. Thanks. We plan to order the same ones again for the Patrol in the summer.
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Terrano
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
A lot has been written about Geolandars! In my size, I got the ones made in Russia, I know there are imported ones, but there's no difference. They run for a long time, although I haven't worn them down to zero yet. I like that they're not noisy on the highway, it's quite comfortable to drive on them, and on off-road they're like all AT tires, but if you reduce the pressure, I was able to get out of mud after rain without any issues!
- Vehicle:
- Toyota RAV4
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
AT tires are a classic, a lot has been said about them and there's nothing to add! Excellent wheels, not noisy despite being AT, far from highway, through the forest, on a dirt road - I drive smoothly, not the first set of tires I've driven, and I'm satisfied with my choice as always!
- Vehicle:
- Suzuki Grand Vitara
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
Good tires. I haven't tried them on snow or ice yet, but I think they won't let me down. It's too early to talk about durability as well. They are a bit noisy. That's why I gave 4 stars. Everything else is fine.
- Vehicle:
- Nissan Terrano
- Size:
- 215/65 R16 98H
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- City:
- Krasnodar
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought my first set in January 2020 with a car mileage of 13,500 km and installed them immediately, as the winter was warm and I didn't see the point of driving on asphalt and puddles with studded tires. The tire is positioned as all-season, has a three-peak marking, and I have experience driving on all-season tires in winter since the last millennium. The new tire on snow is no worse than a winter tire, and on ice, it behaves almost like a studded tire, maybe a little worse. It's worth noting that I drive energetically. The problems with snowfall in February-April were handled with ease. In general, I bought it for asphalt, sand, forest dirt roads, potholes from thawing asphalt in the spring, and numerous tram tracks in our city that don't always lie flat with the road. I tried to keep the pressure at 2 in the front and 1.7 in the back on an empty car. In this case, the ride is good and not stiff. On a loaded car, I pumped 2.1 on both axles. On a wet road, there are no problems with handling. On heated asphalt (the on-board computer showed +45 outside in the Volgograd area), it slightly floated during sharp braking and energetic turns - the tire didn't squeal, it just slightly slid without losing control. I caught aquaplaning once in an asphalt rut at a tread depth of 6 mm. The new tire has a tread depth of 9.5 mm, I measured it myself. In the second winter, I replaced them with winter tires in January, when I got tired of the wet snow nakat, a kind of soap at a temperature of 0 to -5. And every following winter, the tire performed worse. It doesn't become stiff in the frost, and if you don't drive on soap in the winter, there are no problems with careful driving. It can drive in deep snow until you pile it up in front of you. If you let the air out to 0.9, it can drive again and even uphill. But the more worn out it is, the less it likes ice. I drove to Crimea on it twice. Sandy scorching beaches, rocky dirt roads, climbing the White Rock from both sides, the Quiet Bay of Koktebel, and the General's beaches passed without any complaints, but in the heat, you need to monitor the pressure, otherwise, the central part wears out quickly. Last winter, 24-25, I drove on it with a pressure of 1.9 in the front and 1.7 in the back. It doesn't lose handling. I sold it at a mileage of almost 69,000 km and a tread depth of 5 mm in the central grooves and 6 mm on the sides. That's the wear, considering that I drove about 1,500 km on winter tires during this time. I.e., it turns out to be 4.5 mm per 54,000 km. There were no bulges, punctures, or cuts. Now I've bought the same one. The new one was balanced with 50-60 grams per wheel.
- Vehicle:
- Lada 4x4 Urban
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Purchased in size 265/70/17. Driven for 2 seasons - very pleased.
The tire is not LT - noticeably sags under the weight of a fully loaded pickup truck, but the spare height of the profile saves it. In the summer, handling is excellent, like on a highway. There is no aquaplaning. It swallows potholes and joints perfectly. On moderate off-road, it holds the road. On "military" roads, fords, and muddy ruts - it didn't get stuck or slip.
The tread doesn't get clogged much, but it loves to throw stones. Over 2 summers, I've driven 35,000 km - didn't notice much wear.
In the off-season, it allows you to drive confidently, but don't expect miracles. On snow, it still holds, but ice is not for it.
- Vehicle:
- Ford F-150
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- The product was purchased at Mosautoshina
- Rate
For now, I've got what I was looking for - soft, passable, and not noisy. I live in the southern region, so even in January, we haven't seen any winter yet. There are concerns about wear and handling in the summer heat, but that will be seen.
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Grand Starex
- Size:
- 225/65 R17 102H
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- City:
- Астрахань
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Good evening everyone!
I'd like to say thank you for the fast delivery from Rostov to KhMAO.
In May 2024, I ordered these tires because mine had become unserviceable. I read a lot of reviews about different tire models, but I decided to stop at this one because it has few minuses and more pluses. I'll drive for a season and then we'll see. The tires are very good, quiet, and manageable on the highway, and they also handle sand well, like a tank. I haven't tried them in mud, and I didn't buy them for that purpose, but if you occasionally get into it, I drive more on highways and I'll say right away that they're for summer, not for winter - I have studded tires for winter. Along with the tires, I also took the wheels, but I'll describe the wheels in a separate review. Everything was balanced perfectly. And what pleased me the most is that the manufacturing year of the tires is March 2024 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
- Buy again?:
- Definitely yes
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
If you take by the picture on the site, then in reality the tread is more modest. Nevertheless, on a wet road, it's a pass (handling, no aquaplaning) regardless of the flow rate; on ice - it's a cow, with constant ABS working; and on snow, it's normal - it both pulls and starts and brakes. Sand is average (there are nuances, it's a long story...); clay is a four, as well as mud. BUT on the highway! Fuel consumption decreased by 1-1.5!!! which was very surprising, given that after Bridgestone (summer) and Michelin (winter). Not noisy, I expected worse. Balancing - a lot of weight, which was disappointing 85g max vs Bridgestone 40g max. At 205 km/h in the summer, it holds steady.
- Vehicle:
- Mitsubishi Pajero
- Buy again?:
- Most likely
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
