Tyre reviews Yokohama Bluearth AE50 274

The tires came with the new car. For an ordinary crossover, they are excellent, soft, and well-made. On rainy days, they perform well, handling puddles and being very quiet, and they absorb bumps nicely. They are well-suited for rigid suspension as they soften the profile of the tire. I don't see the point in comparing them to top-of-the-line, high-speed models for BMW M or Audi RS, or else the owners of Mitsubishis and Renaults will start showing off, saying they need top-3 tires for their supercars. It's also strange to write that the tires are noisy for the owners of Lancers and Rios - guys, you didn't pay for that when you bought your car. Over 4 years, the tires haven't become worn out, the tread hasn't warped, and forest roads and dirt roads are no problem. They are good tires, period. For city driving, they are a great option. On the highway at 180 km/h, they handle like they're on rails, without drifting.

One of the best tires in terms of price-quality ratio. Before, I had Dunlop Sport, Michelin Energy, Michelin Primacy and some other rubbish (which I'd rather not remember). If I compare them based on certain criteria, I'd rank them as follows:

I. Wear resistance:

1. Michelin Energy
2. Dunlop Sport
3. Yokohama
4. Michelin Primacy;

II. Acoustic and vibr

It performed well on a new car. For budget tires, it's a good buy, price/quality/characteristics. Not noisy, it behaves well on dry surface and on a slightly wet surface, but in heavy rain, especially in case of a pothole, it's much worse. It didn't impress me, I will change to Michelin or Continental.

Moderate noise, but Michelin was quieter. On balancing a new set, we found geometry defects. Under rainy conditions, they behave normally. After 25-30,000 km of run, wear was around 45%, meaning a service life of 2 seasons. At 215-60R16, they look like donuts. Lack of sidewall stiffness. Floats on the tread. Won't buy again for the second time.

After a long search, I finally bought them and I'm very satisfied, despite not having the best sound insulation on my cee'd, they haven't caused any discomfort, they don't wear down quickly. The price fully justifies itself.

When the tire came I tensed up, because it's made in Russia. Time arrived and I put it on. It balanced perfectly, not more than 25 grams. I drove and couldn't believe how quiet the tire is, before I had a Kumho. Even changing road surfaces don't affect the acoustic comfort. It holds the road perfectly, turns are great. In the rain, this tire is one of the best. After summer, I drove 15,000 miles with 1

Fully meets its declared load and speed performance characteristics. Behavior on the road in any weather conditions has pleased me. Plus budget price.

I started with a new car bought from a car dealer, with Bridgestone Turanza 215/50 R17 tires, I drove for 3.5 seasons and about 40-45 thousand km, it was time to change them, in 2017, when I was looking for new tires, Turanza was not in production anymore, and the next model from Bridgestone in the required size cost around 80,000 RUB per wheel. I started looking for something cheaper

I've only had the tyres for two days and already I can tell that the Continentals are a huge improvement in terms of comfort and handling. Maybe I still haven't discovered all its charms, but so far I think it's a great option for city dwellers who occasionally venture out of town for a BBQ. It's quiet, comfortable and has a normal level of ground clearance on rough roads.

I've driven on Yokohamas and on my work vehicle and on my own, and I always thought they were great for our roads. Now I've bought Blue Earths AE50, and it's really good. The roads in my city have been pretty rough as long as I can remember, and driving on Viatys was a total nightmare. I bought the AE50s for 2700 rubles each, 185/65. They are so comfortable! On the road sections where