Tyre reviews Sailun Atrezzo ZSR SUV. Page 11 897

Positive feelings, predictable tire behavior, not noisy. Balanced without problems, tread without small grooves, small stones do not get stuck.

275/55-R20
I didn't expect such comfort for the price! Considering the price and the feeling of everyday city driving, I can give the highest rating. But, if I'm being picky, I'd note the sensitivity to ruts at speed. A slight hum at speeds above 100km/h. I recommend purchasing!

I bought 235/60/18. The tire is quite quiet, doesn't throw out of the rut, handling is good. On a wet road, the car doesn't skid. I bought Chinese tires for the first time and had a lot of doubts before buying. So far, everything is fine. The only concern left from other owners' reviews is rapid wear. We'll see by the end of the season.

The biggest downside is that the tires are very noisy, and there are questions about handling on wet asphalt. On the plus side, they balanced well, better than European ones.

Forget all stereotypes about Chinese products. Today I put Chinese tires on my car. I'm shocked. In terms of noise, it's better than Bridgestone. It handles joints and unevenness perfectly. It was balanced without any problems. The sidewall is stiff. I managed to accelerate on the M4 highway to 140 km/h, I can let go of the steering wheel, it goes like it's stuck to the road. Next, I will test it in other conditions, maybe there will be some drawbacks.

The tire is soft, not too noisy, balanced perfectly, minimal weights, stops the car and holds the road well, even in the rain, I'm satisfied with the purchase!!!

Overall, decent tires for their price. Two seasons worked perfectly. But the sidewall tread is a bit weak, worn out to zero

One of the best tires, definitely the BEST for its price.

I'm writing this review after a full season of use, with over 15,000 km driven. (5,000 km of which were on the highway from Moscow to Sochi and back, at speeds of 180-200 km/h, and in our southern region)

I thought for a long time about whether to buy them, looked at reviews, tried to find feedback from acquaintances who are knowledgeable about this issue or have experience in auto sports. A year ago, there was little information about them, as most people didn't consider Chinese tires in the past or hadn't had a chance to drive on them. I knew that they were used in drift racing (where tires are a very important factor), and the world champion had a contract with them and showed the best results. I understand that he may have had completely different tires, and of a different composition. But nonetheless, the manufacturer clearly knows how to make top-notch tires. Plus, an acquaintance of mine, who has over 15 years of experience in auto sports, told me that he had purchased several sets for the upcoming Time Attack racing season. (The result after the season: 2nd place in the championship, and no other Chinese tires were in the top 8, only well-known brands with better tire models)

Due to the price, I decided to buy them, thinking that if I didn't like them, I could just sell them for 20% less and that's it. At the time, I bought them from MosaVtoshin - 275 width on R22 - for 39,000 rubles, and that's for a set of 4. (For comparison, other tires that I think are good were priced from 170,000 rubles for a set).

I have something to compare them to. I've used tires from Michelin (from the terrible Primacy HP 3 to almost all types of Pilot Sport: PS2, PS3, 4, 5, SuperSport, Sport Cup 2) on different cars in different modes, conditions, and so on (including racing tracks and different disciplines), Bridgestone - Potenza, Turanza, Yokohama Advan Sport, Neova, Toyo 8, Proxes, Continental: ContiPremiumContact and SportContact of different generations, and others. In most cases, these were not "city" models from these manufacturers, but top sports models or ones with a sports slant).

Yes, the Michelin SuperSport is significantly better, even the PS series is better, but the question is how much better? And the main question is for what kind of use and on what cars?

I don't think it's worth considering for a Porsche 911 or an MB C 6.3, as I've driven on Michelin SuperSport before and was very satisfied. I'm sure that owners of such cars don't look at Chinese tires, and if they have the means, they choose the best ones regardless of cost.

On a sports car, I would use the aforementioned Michelin SuperSport.

But for an everyday car, I chose the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR SUV in size 275/40 R22. The car is a Range Rover Sport 5.0 SC. I had doubts about how they would perform on a heavy and powerful car, with 570 horsepower and almost 3 tons of weight.

Considering that this is not a sports coupe, and I don't drive at the limit, but I also don't drive slowly, always with good acceleration, braking, lane changes, and long turns, I didn't experience any disappointment, quite the opposite, although I was waiting for the first month to see if the tires would "play some trick". I also tested them on a wet road, starting with small puddles and a water-filled lane. At low speed, faster, with turns, acceleration, and braking in these conditions. And here I was extremely pleasantly surprised. But I think that in my case, the weight of the car played a big role, although it was worse with the previous tires. And maybe on a light car, it wouldn't be the same.

They are very comfortable, moderately soft, and as for noise, it's hard to say, on the MKAD highway with fresh asphalt, even when listening carefully, nothing can be heard, it feels like flying over the road. Here, it may not be entirely objective, as the RR is a comfortable car in itself, plus I had a full sound insulation done.

As for durability: I didn't measure the tread depth, but visually, the wear for the season (15-20 thousand km) is acceptable, I think I can drive for another 2 seasons (not to zero), and then sell them. I expected more wear.

And here, it's essential to understand that tires with such properties cannot be hard and indestructible.

Comparison with other CHINESE TIRES: don't even compare them to the vast majority of other Chinese tires, there are unique cases (like this one), but in most cases, they are far worse than these tires, and even worse than some other mid-range models. I've driven many sets of the first ones on this list (different models). Sailun Atrezzo ZSR is the closest to the top models of well-known brands, and better than their average/city models.

In conclusion, even for a heavy, powerful city car, the tires showed themselves to be very good in different driving styles. And I can't say that they are just normal or comparable to other brands, they are excellent and better than 95% of the tires on the market, including expensive ones. For 90% of drivers, the difference will be imperceptible, even when compared to top, expensive brands.

Also, on regular cars (small cars, crossovers), it's not worth choosing a brand just because of the brand, even if it's the same price or more expensive. If I were offered a choice between "basic" Bridgestone/Continental/Michelin, like Primacy HP, or Sailun Atrezzo ZSR, I would choose Sailun 100%.

These are subjective thoughts and only about SUMMER TIRES, my view on winter tires is different.

Technical support, what nonsense is this? I'm talking about the mandatory indication of the rating on ice and snow for summer tires (possibly for off-road A/T, M/T, this is relevant, but for highway tires, it's less relevant, and it will affect the overall rating)??? I put a rating of 1, as I couldn't not rate it.

The seller shipped a set of 295/45 R21 tires with a visible defect, geometric distortion due to improper storage. When pointed out that they were crooked, the seller claimed it was not a defect, refused to refund the money, but agreed to exchange them for suitable ones of the same size. After an hour of searching for the required size, nothing was found. The seller assured that after mounting, the tires would fit the rim and everything would be fine. At the tire mounting service, the tires were rotated on the rims three times to achieve balance, with the best balancing result being 20 grams on 80 grams. The tire mounting service cost 15,500 rubles, taking into account the discount. As a result, while driving, the steering wheel shakes and the vibration from the rear suspension is transmitted throughout the vehicle. Claims about the curvature of the tires and runout are not accepted, citing the loss of their marketable appearance. Not recommended!

Good tire, at speeds of 200+ on long right turns, a barely noticeable vibration appears. Otherwise, everything is great. The weight of the tire itself is slightly more than that of expensive competitors.