Tyre reviews Sailun Ice Blazer WST1 381

I had a positive experience with the Sailun Atrezzo summer tire in the 225/45/17 size on my Saab 9.3. I drove for two seasons without any issues (speed, potholes – it handled everything), and I liked the tire (I previously used Michelin). It was even quieter and softer. When I changed cars to a crossover and needed to buy winter tires, I decided to go with Sailun again. The summer tire performed well, so

Until now, I had never used Chinese tires, thinking that it was impossible to get high-quality tires in China. However, after buying a new car, I discovered that it was equipped with Chinese tires during the tire rotation. I looked up information about the tires online and was pleasantly surprised to find out that the China-based manufacturer Hengyu chose to use this Chinese tire for its quality and price. The tire is soft, wear-resistant, and very lightweight. The price was especially surprising, as I

I've driven 2000 km on highways and in the city during a severe snowstorm and ice.

There's snow up to my knees in St. Petersburg right now. I'm feeling positive.

Yes, it was difficult to get dressed, but the technicians immediately inflated to 6 atmospheres and everything's fine. The maximum load is 35, and it handles well up to 130 km/h. It floats like any winter tire beyond 130 km/h,

Impressions after one winter season are the most positive. The price-to-quality ratio is excellent. I frankly didn't notice any difference after driving on this tire and before I drove on Goodyear and Nokian, but the price difference is noticeable. The tire is soft, quiet, the car holds the road well and grips in the snow. Initially, I thought I would put a Chinese tire on the Touareg, but since I don't live in Moscow, but in Russia,

I bought them on offer. I never expected the Chinese to make such a great tire. Ever since, I don't look at brands anymore. I have a lot of experience with Hakkas and Bridgestones. This one is no worse. It's comparable to the Finnish-made Hakkapeliitta 4 by feel. Over three seasons, I've lost zero studs. Over three winters, I've never gotten stuck to the point where I wouldn't be able to get out on my own (

Great bite on ice. Even on such a cow as Volga.
No issues even when starting on ice at a good incline.
Mileage is currently low, but the studs are all in place.

Soft tire. Holds ice well even at 120 km/h (no point going faster anyway, as I'm rear-wheel drive). Handles snow well too. Can't say much about durability yet as the mileage is not that high. No aquaplaning issues noticed. Braking distance is normal. Quiet. The husband is pleased. The price-quality ratio is 5.

They have a bit too little of studs, the price seemed overpriced to me, keeps well new, put on the front axle, there's a feeling of insufficient grip on ice, I have them on the front axle, the main task of them is to resist side slipping, so I'm not driving very actively). Overall, they work, but could be better, on dry road and snow, normal, there's no excitement, just a studded tire.

They are doing well, didn't notice any difference compared to the other brands.

-20 in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, don't skid, catch on ice, spin on snow… Good tires! The studs are all in place, I felt confident on the rear axle, but minus, they are much louder and fuel consumption increased.

As I have read a lot of reviews, I decided to give it a try. I've been driving with it since mid-October (I installed it earlier as my summer tire had died completely the day after I bought this one).

RESULT: The price-quality ratio is excellent. The tire behaves well on any surface and at any speed (I think it's not worth driving on icy roads at over 120-130 mph), up to 180 mph. For the winter