Tyre reviews Sailun Atrezzo ZSR SUV 611

Good day. I want to share my story to warn you - consumers, from making a similar mistake, and to be more cautious when dealing with the seller "MOSSAVTOSHINA".

So, I decided to purchase Sailun Atrezzo ZSR SUV 27545 R21 summer tires on March 22, just before the season. On the advice of my friends, who said that Sailun and Triangle tires from China are the best, I had no doubts, I had to buy them. After conducting a survey, I found that it would be more expensive to buy them in my region, 3,000 rubles per wheel, than to bring them from Moscow. I chose MOSSAVTOSHINA. They have a huge selection, a support service, and a low price, and the statistics of reviews are not bad (jumping ahead, I should have read the negative reviews). The tires were delivered in 10 days, which I consider fast, no questions asked. After inspecting the tires at the terminal, I immediately went to the tire fitting service. We have guys who do disc painting and restoration, and they have a HUNTER 2 tire fitting machine (remember this fact).

I put on the tires, everything was perfectly balanced, the tire fitter said I was lucky, the tires were even. I was happy, thinking I hadn't fallen into the statistics, and I went to test the tires on the roads where I could drive fast. After 10 minutes, I was on the highway, but what was my surprise, the steering wheel was shaking and the body was vibrating, what a road... it couldn't be that the balance was off, since I had personally controlled the process.

After driving for another 30 minutes, I called the tire center, told them the situation... So, I came to them again, we took off the tires, spun them, and what did we see? They were crooked. Visually, we saw that 2 out of 4 tires were in terrible condition. It's worth noting that the first balancing was done after loading 600 kg on the machine. The conclusion is that the tires behave inadequately under load, it's impossible to balance them, and after re-balancing, the tire behaves the same way.

The HUNTER 2 machine has the capability to detect non-compliance with the tire norm, deviations. I recorded these data and wrote to the support service. This is where the most interesting part begins. For 5 days, I was trying to contact people who could really influence the process of considering the defect! It's impossible to call them, everything goes through email. The manager, I must give him credit, accepted my claim and said I should send the tires to them, at their expense (respect). In fact, all 4 tires are complete garbage, but I decided to send 2, the most inadequately behaving ones. I passed all the information, photos, and video recordings to the manager, as well as the statistics of the computer diagnosis on the machine, in general, he had no questions, it was noted that there was enough information. At the end of April, I sent the tires, and then, the tedious waiting began.

On June 21!!! I received a message that the check had been carried out (2 months!!!) and the tires comply with GOST 52900-2007, the check was carried out on a calibrated HUNTER machine.

In response to my request to provide me with video and photo materials, they replied with a kind SILENCE. They wrote a conclusion and put their stamp (of their legal entity). When I asked if they had loaded the tires before diagnostics, they replied with silence. After 4 days of suffering from correspondence, I managed to talk to the responsible person, and the answer was clear - the tires are in order, the conclusion says so, we sent the tires to you, goodbye.

Based on the above, I consider it my duty to warn consumers to clearly understand what consequences may arise from this organization! The chance of such situations is likely minimal, but just like me, anyone can "GET LUCKY"!!!

As a result, I note that the tires hold the road not bad, a bit noisy. But the fact that such a large percentage of defects, I would not risk again! According to statistics, the chance of getting a defective tire is high for tires with a radius of 20 and above, a smaller radius gives a low percentage of defects!

Special "respect" to MOSSAVTOSHINA, a miserable assessment of the product, a response for the sake of formality!

Bought on the advice of comrades, balanced to zero, drove 10 km and started to vibrate. Came again to the tire shop, complete imbalance. Two tires with altered geometry, took a video, performed tests on the Hunter machine, which showed significant deviations. As a result, I left two tires more or less, sent two to Mosavtoshina, where they made a pseudo-conclusion for 2 months, putting the tire on a disk without letting it drive.

The result is - the tire is TERRIBLE, it's impossible to drive more than 100!

Mosavtoshina - scammers

I've always driven on Continentals, but this season I decided to take a chance and try Sailuns, which are half the price. I was pleasantly surprised. They balanced out perfectly, and in terms of handling, there's hardly any difference with Continentals, maybe a bit louder, but they hold nicely in turns, and in the rain, everything is fine. I'll see how long they last, but so far, I'm very happy.

I'm a Chinese, took it for the first time. Bought it last year and only managed to drive it for one season, but the opinion has already been formed. The tires are satisfactory in all aspects, but there is one big drawback - it pulls very strongly into the rut, sometimes even triggering the ESP. This has never happened with any other tires. Maybe it's just my size, 295/40 R21.

The supplier of Mosavtoshina is disrupting delivery times.

Regarding the tires: price-quality. I drive actively and a lot, and the regions from the north to the hot south. The tires feel the temperature fluctuations like any other, BUT noticeably "leads" when overheated. Not for high speeds, you can briefly reach 2++ but not for long. With a daily mileage of 1500-1600 km, you have to stop and reduce the pressure from 3.2 to 2.4. Wear at 20 thousand kilometers is 25-30 percent.

In terms of quality, it's no worse than Yokohama Parade, but not better than Michelin or Continental. In general, the first season on a heavy car is normal, it doesn't float on the track, it throws water, and doesn't catch aquaplaning. It's a bit critically noisy.

Size 275/55-20.
I purchased from Mosavtoshina (Order 2576747). Delivery, feedback - everything is perfect! I had the tires mounted by my own master, despite the promotion when buying. Balancing was done without any issues. I inflated to 2.4.
I changed the tires quite early (March 12), so I haven't driven in normal summer temperatures yet. I'll update the review later.
Pros:
- Price (I bought for 9500r per tire - maybe it got cheaper by the end of February),
- Very quiet,
- Soft, so joints, potholes, and others are passed unnoticed,
- No aquaplaning,
Cons:
- Too soft and, likely due to this, the car floats when making sharp turns, especially in a rut, I have to catch it with the steering wheel. I dread how it will be in the heat!
- The side view looks cheap)).
I've driven three summers on Yokohama Parade before Sailun. For me, this is the ideal tire, but today's price of 25000 rubles per tire outweighs all the pros. If Sailun cost 15 instead of 10, I would have bought Yokohama for 25)), but as it is, of course, Sailun wins.
I definitely recommend this Sailun Atrezzo and Mosavtoshina!

Haven't tried it on the highway for long distances yet, but around town it's not bad, no noise, holds the road well and stops well too

The European all-season Continental didn't even last 30 thousand kilometers and wore out horribly. It didn't behave well on wet roads even when it was new, and when it was worn out, it started to hydroplane mercilessly. As a bonus, it would push water forward and create a lot of splashes on the windshield. So, it was decided to retire it and buy new tires. European brands were considered last due to their inadequate prices. I looked at Belshina and Chinese brands. The surveys I conducted led me to Sailun. Unfortunately, Mosavtoshina didn't have a set, so I bought it from another store. The wheels are even, balanced well with a maximum of 40 grams per wheel. Since the old Conti was worn out to the wear indicators, I drove the last 3 thousand kilometers with a constant hum, so the new Sailun with its developed tread didn't seem particularly loud to me. The behavior on dry asphalt is without questions, as well as on wet roads, and it's like driving on dry roads even when going through puddles and flooded potholes. There are no jerks, hydroplaning, or skidding whatsoever. The disgusting effect of water being thrown onto the windshield is gone. I specifically drove into puddles with one side of the car and onto dry road with the other, and there were absolutely no bumps. I haven't noticed any impact on fuel consumption yet. I'll continue to observe.

Good day! I bought 295/40 R21 tires for my GLS. I'm 100% satisfied with the tires, to be honest, I had concerns, but the tires are really of good quality (the Chinese have learned to make tires). In terms of comfort and driving characteristics, they are not inferior to well-known brands. In terms of noise level, they even seemed quieter to me than Continental. I used to have Continental tires all the time (on Mercedes, BMW, Audi), but this year I was very disappointed in them, brand new tires wore out in less than half a season, installed in April, and by the end of June they were gone (after 18,000 km of mileage).

Good luck to all on the roads.

On this machine, the low mileage tires last for two seasons. Dunlop lasted one, and throwing away 50,000 RMB per tire per season is not very good. SAILUN is fairly priced and the difference in handling is completely unnoticeable compared to expensive brands.