Tyre reviews Sailun Atrezzo ZSR SUV. Page 6 917

I ordered four wheels with different widths, 275/40 and 315/35, with a radius of 20, on 21.03.24, and picked them up from the store on Aviamotornaya, Moscow, on 22.03.24, in the first half of the day. The order had a delivery time of 3 to 5 working days, but I asked the girls (thank you very much) to deliver them from the central warehouse as soon as possible, and that's what happened. The tire mounting was done at a different location, where I had my disks painted, and I didn't want to risk doing it at Mosavtoshina, i.e., those who painted them also mounted them. The geometry is normal, I personally checked it during the balancing process and didn't find any vibrations or "eights", it's practically ideal. I drove and didn't find any vibrations, I checked within the range of up to 140 km/h, and at the time of writing this review, I've driven about a hundred kilometers around Moscow. The noise level is the same as with the branded run-flat (except for Michelin, which is soft and quiet). In two days, I plan to take a trip to Nizhny Novgorod on the toll road, 400 km, and about a hundred kilometers from Arzamas to Nizhny Novgorod on a bad road, I'll write a separate review about that. So far, I'm satisfied.

Excellent tires that do not concede in quality to European counterparts. The only thing that wears out a bit faster. For such a cost, it is justified.

I used to have Kumho tires. In terms of handling and noise, Sailun tires are no worse. I've only noticed one drawback, stones get stuck in the tread grooves.

Nothing to complain about. There was no extreme operation. In normal mode - city/highway everything is fine. Not noisy.

Purchased for Audi Q5. First impressions are positive.
Well-balanced, with a minimal number of weights.
Confidently feel in the rain, good braking. Not noisy.
Driven 1500 km, so I couldn't assess wear resistance.
In general, a decent alternative to renowned competitors.

ML 350, quiet ride mode. The tire is like tires - everything is fine. There are no excesses: noise, poor handling on wet and other things are not! I've driven a little so far (since April, around the city), so I can't say about wear. If everything continues like this and there is good wear resistance, then I don't see the point in European tires.

I wrote a review because I myself was looking for a tire by reviews.

Excellent tire, quiet, durable, aquaplaning in turns is normal, not the first tires of this brand on many of our cars LK200 CRV 4 SX5 FF3 Avensis, everyone likes, wears out quickly, in general, I recommend, you won't regret it

Excellent tires, especially considering their cost. The sidewall is moderately soft, very quiet, up to 80 km/h it's completely inaudible. It handles aquaplaning excellently. In strong heat, it doesn't "float". I've driven 8 thousand kilometers, no wear and tear.

Balances well, European tires rustle, these have a different sound of a lower frequency. But not significant.

The tires are of very good quality, the only thing I would like is for the tread to be a couple of millimeters thicker, as in deep ruts during heavy rain, I feel the beginnings of slight aquaplaning, although at speeds over 105 km/h. I find the solution of a non-proportional pattern execution around the circumference to be original. I hope this is a scientifically technological trick-development.