Tyre reviews Nokian WR. Page 3 669

Satisfied, but not ideal

I bought it accidentally in the fall of 2005 at METRO. The price pleased me - 440 hryvnias per wheel at the then exchange rate of $ = 5.0. Since then, I've driven three winters and, having crossed myself, I've changed the car to the fourth.

second year. flight excellent

it's me Andrey, already the second winter! after the last winter, I didn't change the tires, decided to check the all-season, everything is 5+, for spring-summer-autumn I drove 18,000 km. wear of the rear 1-2 mm, front 4-5 mm, in a week I will swap them and go ahead, in the summer I was in Europe and on our off-road everywhere they behaved very

Creditable tire, pity it's no longer for sale

With breaks, I've driven 4 winters on different sizes on Saab 95 and Saab 95 Aero. In between, I put on Goodyear and Continental. I returned to WR. In spring, I take them off - because from +15 and above, the tires slide and melt. But in winter - the car drives like on rails. With ESP, you can boldly drive on a snow-covered left lane in

Two winters have passed without problems

I've driven two winters without problems. I put them on for the third time - I think they'll be enough for the fourth time too. They handle dry asphalt and rain perfectly. They're good on snow, but when I hit ice, they slip, of course, this is not a studded tire, but the skid is predictable and the car remains manageable. When the temperature is above +10-15 degrees, catastrophic wear begins...

What a complete disaster!!!

I've driven 20,000 km, I've never seen such terrible tires! On snowy slush, the car is uncontrollable, on dry pavement, there's wild wear on the outer and inner treads! I've already thrown away two tires, and instead, I put on Goodyear GW-3, which have survived 2 winters and I'm as happy as can be!!! For the next winter season, only Goodyear!!!

For a snowless winter
There was no snow fun. And when it piled up, and there's ice underneath - a complete disaster... The car doesn't respond to turns or acceleration. And braking should be done in advance - almost like in summer.
Pros: You can "fly" on asphalt in winter
Cons: Lots of snow and ice - a complete failure!

Beautiful tire for the city

I drove 5,000 km in the winter. Excellent tire. Can be installed in October and removed in May. It behaves predictably on snow, on ice, on wet asphalt. I'm satisfied with the tire. At a temperature > +15, it starts to get a little dull, but since it's a winter tire, it behaves normally. The abbreviation WR, as I understood, means for various winter weather, but not summer.

Pros

Super tire !!!!
Excellent tire!! I bought, drove 35 thousand around Kiev and Chernihiv region... NO complaints... Snow, rain, mud all to the knees!!!! Super aquaplaning
Pros: Not noisy, super aquaplaning, low wear
Cons: did not find

Very pleased!

I've driven 2 winter seasons (October - April) - no complaints, total mileage on the tires is around 20 thousand. I didn't notice any excessive wear - 70% of the tread is left on the front. It's just not very keen on making friends with ice. On wet snow, slush, and mud, it behaves excellently, and the directional stability is also top-notch. IMHO - wonderful tires....but only for winter.

Excellent tires

I've driven for 2 seasons, and half of the summer was in Odessa. The wear is very small - the eight is still visible. It handles the road perfectly. I've driven, at most 120, in heavy rain - on the intercity route from Nikolaev to Odessa - it doesn't hydroplane. At temperatures above 30, of course, it does drift a bit, but predictably. In general, PREDOMINANTLY P