Tyre reviews Nokian WR. Page 2 669

The best for my short experience
Renault Kengaa 175/65/14 installed this winter, already driven 1500, at a speed of 120-130 normal. In the summer, I drove on native Continentals - very hard and noisy (for sale)
Pros: on wet and dirty roads super
Cons: did not notice

Excellent winter tires

Installed on Ford Focus. Size 204/60/16. This is not a standard size, but I installed such tires consciously, since the car becomes 1 cm higher. The Focus has a small clearance and I consider its increase in winter to be useful.

Ride-2 days

2 drove - so far nothing. The road holds well, not noisy, let's see in winter. I bought a wheel for 315 UAH. In Trade Line - 399 UAH. When asked what the difference is, the last answer was - the manufacturer, although visually there is no difference (made in Finland, both). Regarding the inscription on the tire near the snowflake All weather plus, no seller gave me a clear answer to my question,

If we consider it as an all-season tire - it's fine. For winter, you need to get different ones.

Last winter I drove normally. I put it on after the all-season Toyo, and I felt the difference in a better way, but not like "wow". The winter was not snowy.

Replacement after the standard, heaven and earth, very quiet and soft

I never used winter tires and never had any problems, winters in Odessa are mild, but even when it snowed heavily, the most important thing is driving experience. Two years ago, I bought AVEO, naturally, it had tires, very noisy, but I had no other complaints, I drove two winters without slipping or skidding, but this summer the tires started to slip on dry roads (became brittle

Good!

I've been driving on these tires since summer. In the summer, they behaved very well even in the heat. The only thing is the noise at speeds of 100-120 km/h. I got stuck in the sand, and it was no problem - the car came out on its own, although it's not an off-road vehicle at all. In the winter, I want more traction, especially on ice. But at low speeds, it's enough. I've noticed

So far so good
I've driven 2000 km so far and I'm satisfied. They don't make much noise, compared to Bridgestone they are almost silent. On wet asphalt, they brake well and handle turns nicely. There was a bit of black ice, but I didn't notice any skidding. I haven't had any snow yet, so I can't say anything about that. Overall, the impressions are excellent.
Pros: good road holding
Cons

Not satisfied

In terms of noise and softness, there's nothing to complain about, but I know better tires when it comes to winter properties. The main drawback is the car's drift (to the right in my case) and the problem lies in the tires. I know this is more of a problem with the W, but I "got lucky" with the WR in this regard. In short, it's a lottery (my opinion)

Pros: Quiet

Excellent tires
I've driven 40,000 km (2 years) in winter and summer, in rain and slush, and they've never let me down. Not a single puncture throughout the entire period. The only downside is the high wear. Although, if used only in winter, it's quite normal.
Pros: Excellent passability and directional stability.
Cons: Wear

Review of WR 174/65/14, Lanos

In terms of noise and softness, it's excellent, I was very pleased at first, until I drove out of the city. I feel a vagueness in the steering wheel response at speeds above 100 km/h in any weather, probably due to the softness of the tire. The wear on the front wheels after 10,000 km (in spring-summer) is a quarter. But the main thing is