Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka H. Page 2 865

  • Nokian Hakka H
    Nokian Hakka H

Статистика отзывов на шины Nokian Hakka H

Ниже отображены сводные характеристики шины, основанные на отзывах и оценках автовладельцев со всего мира.
При учёте общей оценки летней шины её показатели на снегу и льду не учитываются.

  • Средняя оценка шин Nokian Hakka H пользователями сайта: 4.05 из 5
  • Количество отзывов на шины Nokian Hakka H: 865 шт.
  • Место в рейтинге: 869
  • Место в рейтинге (летние): 418
Control on a dry road
Braking on dry roads
Steering in the wet
Braking on wet roads
Control on dirt
Drive comfort
Internal noise
Quiet in motion
Braking efficiency
Resistant to aquaplaning
Velocity characteristics
Wearability
Quality of production
Price justifiability
Все оценки пользователей
Оценки реальных покупателей

Оценки шин Nokian Hakka H по месяцам

По распределению
оценок

1
1%
2
3%
3
7%
4
48%
5
41%
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    3.8

    Excellent price-quality ratio. I've never been one to get riled up about a hill I couldn't climb, but when the snow hit... and I live in the mountain area! Fantastic affordable tire that grips a lot better than its weight would suggest.

    Vehicle:
    VW Sharan 1.8T
    Size:
    215/55 R16 H
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Braking on dry roads
    Steering in the wet
    Braking on wet roads
    Drive comfort
    Internal noise
    External noise
    Wearability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    4.8

    The tire is very good. It handles well on wet asphalt with puddles. It's a bit noisy, but not that it's uncomfortable. I've driven about 25,000 km - there is some wear, but it's still far from replacement, possibly because of a calm driving style. I would recommend it without a doubt.

    Vehicle:
    Audi A6  2,6L  1994-1997
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    4.6

    Spent a summer+summer and a winter (rarely, as I have a jeep) + summer (2011). Essentially, I bought this tire in 2009. I've been riding on it ever since. The protector on the front tires has worn off by 50% and on the rear tires by 30%. The only minus is that it's noisy. Rating: price vs quality - 5 points. The tire was a pleasant surprise.

    Vehicle:
    Hyundai Coupe  2,0L  2001-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    4.8

    Before this I had Bridgestone B 250. They were much quieter compared to them. Good handling on any surface, I'm not sure about heat though, the tyre is a all-season (M+S on the sidewall, but for North America). The load index in my case is 195/65/15 - 95, whereas the previous wheels were 91 due to which the wheels appear to have a higher profile, especially the lighter rear. I opted for a speed index of

    Vehicle:
    Honda Civic  1,8L  2006-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    4.6

    NOKIAN Hakka H, size 195/65-15, made it through three seasons.

    It grips the road exceptionally well, especially on wet surfaces! It even performs better on wet than on dry roads. It holds the turn tightly, I've noticed that I can take sharper turns at higher speeds than other drivers. Excellent wear resistance, after three seasons there are still 5 mm of tread left. A bit noisy, especially on old and potholed asphalt. It booms loudly

    Vehicle:
    Renault Laguna (B56)  1,6L  1994-1997
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    3.7

    The first season rode normally. It was only disappointing that the tires are quite loud and howling. On certain types of asphalt at a speed of around 110 km/h, the hum resonates and the car howls like a taking-off jet plane. In the second season, they stopped balancing. I drove all summer with vibration at speeds of around 80-90. I put on winter tires and the vibration disappeared. And I spent a lot of money on rebalancing and other stuff.

    Vehicle:
    Mitsubishi Lancer  1,6L  2003-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    4.6

    Driven about 30,000 km. Impressions are only positive. Compared to the previous tire - Yokohama A drive, Hakkapeliitta is quieter, softer, better holds the turn, sharper when maneuvering (less pronounced sidewall drift), loses traction at a higher speed. Wear is quite normal - after 30,000 km, the indicator on the front wheels is still visible at 6 mm, and on the rear wheels, 8 mm can be distinguished.

    I

    Vehicle:
    Dacia Logan  1,4L  2005-2007
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    4.8

    Very convenient tires. Low internal noise and good handling. The only disadvantage would be slightly higher rolling resistance compared to the Michelin E3A. In any other way better than Michelin.

    Vehicle:
    Renault clio
    Size:
    185/60 R15 H
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Braking on dry roads
    Steering in the wet
    Braking on wet roads
    Drive comfort
    Internal noise
    External noise
    Wearability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    4.5

    Much better than Dunlop SP 2020. Very good quality tires with accurate wear indicators. Excellent handling on wet and dry. The place company hadn't seen them before, but were impressed with them when I took them back after 1000 miles, like the values wore.

    Vehicle:
    opel vectra dti 16v
    Size:
    205/60 R15 H
    Buy again?:
    Definitely yes
    Control on a dry road
    Braking on dry roads
    Steering in the wet
    Braking on wet roads
    Drive comfort
    Internal noise
    External noise
    Wearability
  • about tyre Nokian Hakka H

    Rate
    3.1

    185/65/R15. Installed after driving half of the summer on winter tires (Continental Conti winter contact). Maybe that's why the review is slightly subjective, since I haven't driven any other tires on this car. The tires are no less noisy than the winter Conti. Quite stiff. Balanced more or less, with only 170g on one wheel, and 30-50g on the others. Drove 8000km, with 1mm of wear on the

    Vehicle:
    Opel Astra G  1,6L  1998-2004
    Control on a dry road
    Steering in the wet
    Drive comfort
    Course stability
    Quiet in motion
    Braking efficiency
    Resistant to aquaplaning
    Velocity characteristics
    Wearability
    Quality of production
    Price justifiability