Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka Green 3. Page 3 127

No drawbacks have been noticed so far. Handling, braking, noise - everything is good. How it will behave further on will be seen.

Honestly, I'm very disappointed. It could be a defect, of course, since this tire is made in Russia. But after 6000 km, one wheel is almost worn out, and I've checked the alignment twice, and the pressure even more often. And Continental winter tires are three times quieter even on rough asphalt. And with Nokian, there was such a hum regardless of the surface, and it doesn't save fuel at all. Given the price, it's even hard to find any advantages.

Everything is fine, but it's a bit noisy on the highway.

Used to only recognize Michelin, now in terms of price and quality, Nokian rules.

Standard tires.

I recommend, for me comfort comes first, I took it for Renault Fluence, the feeling after driving is simply unreal, you can only hear the sound of the engine, the sound of the tires is not heard at all. Very soft rubber, joints and small potholes pass perfectly without noise, in the rain it doesn't float, the grip is excellent. Since the sidewall of the tires is very soft, it is consequently easily damaged, you need to be extremely careful when driving through potholes in courtyards. I'll repeat, I chose these tires because I value comfort while driving.

Excellent tires

I won't say anything bad.

Super!!!!
Previously, Michelin was used in operation, both summer and winter, there is something to compare with.
Completely switched to Nokian and 100% satisfied

After the Deshmon Continental tires that were on the new car from the salon, these are just a fairy tale. Soft, quiet. Very noticeable when in the yard they cut the asphalt into squares and you drive over it and it's very smooth. The car has become noticeably more comfortable than on cheap tires.