Tyre reviews Кама Евро 519. Page 10 714
- Rate
I last replaced my winter tires in 2008, and I suppose there’s no need to remind you that it was a tough time back then, and I had to buy some tires that weren’t too hard on the budget. I chose the Kamet 519 at the time, and between cordiatum and Kamet, I opted for the latter. The tire has given me no cause for an emergency replacement over the past 4 years; half of its studs are still in place on all
- Vehicle:
- Hyundai Accent 1,3L 2002-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I chose the tire between Hankook Winter i*Pike, Dunlop Winter Ice 01 and Kumho Euro 519 (approximately the same cost). I picked Kumho after reading positive reviews. I'm very satisfied with my choice. The tire behaves well on ice. On loose snow, I sometimes feel like a 4x4 driver - it drives smoothly over a snowdrift with the snow layer above the lower bumper edge by 5cm. The cornering grip is average. It
- Vehicle:
- Toyota Corolla 1,5L 2002-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Pretty tire, got it from the showroom, sold it that way. Not very quiet, but that's what you want for winter tires. Holds the road well, no issues, together with the short-wheelbase Fabia on icy junctions at speed it produces a predictable and impressive slide, even on asphalt, steering is very sharp, but it comes at the cost of stiffness. Driving over potholes on asphalt - questionable pleasure. Got stuck once - completely flat on a frozen surface. Performs well
- Vehicle:
- Skoda Fabia 1,4L 2000-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I'm very satisfied with the tire, it's excellent in snow, excellent braking and a very good treadwear, handling is excellent. In terms of noise, I would not say it's any noisier than a standard studded tire. After a season only one stud (on the left front) has worn off. The tire itself feels noticeably harder. Subjectively, the tire is no worse than the Continental ContiViking2, and it's actually better in snow when compared (I
- Vehicle:
- Daihatsu Sirion 1,3L 2000-2006
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Ridden 55,000 km on the tire, size 185/70R14. Holds the road perfectly, traction on hard surfaces - a solid 4 out of 4. Quietness - simply excellent, I have something to compare it to. On ice, the car behaves predictably and decently. A good tire for its price.
- Vehicle:
- Renault Laguna 1,6L 1998-2000
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I've read reviews about the Kamu Euro 519, thought maybe we're finally making decent tires in Russia. I bought and installed them... and it's a disaster. There's so much noise in the car... and it's various kinds, to your taste. With such a racket, you can't even drive. I don't think I'll ever buy anything made in Russia again. It feels like the positive reviews about Kamu are either fake or left by idiots.
- Vehicle:
- Chevrolet Aveo 1,6L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I bought 205/55/R16 in the fall of 2008 for 2500 per wheel. Driven for two seasons (30,000 km) and in the fall of 2010 sold it at a profit with almost new tread and bought a new set for 3000 per wheel. The tire is very good. It surpasses Nokian Hakkapeliitta 4 according to factory tests. The main thing is not to forget about run-in of at least 500
- Vehicle:
- Skoda Octavia 1,6L 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
I'm running without studs. It's going to be the second winter. The tire is a good class. And I don't need Michelin and Goodyear anymore. All of them have improved their quality a bit. And Pirelli and Kamaz. Too bad that Cordiant is so expensive, I'd like to try it too. But as for Kamaz, it's extremely good. Sorry for the frankness, but Barum just doesn't compare. Maybe they'll also strip
- Vehicle:
- Peugeot 407 2,0TD 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Worth the tire.
Have been driving on them for 2 seasons with no problems at all. Definitely worth mentioning the snow traction and on ice she brakes like its stuck.
Also, she is the cheapest in the 205/55 R16 size.- Vehicle:
- Ford Focus 2 1,8TD 2004-2007
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability
- Rate
Reno Logan 1.4L 185/70/R14 First, I decided to import, opted for Yokohama, price was okay, but it turned out there were only 2 in stock, while elsewhere the price exceeded 3,000 RUB (new import or new season, probably). For me, this is quite a strong advantage. Therefore, I decided to take a proven Amtel (too noisy), but after reading what people write, I decided to take a
- Vehicle:
- Renault Alpine A610 Turbo 3,0L 1990-1994
- Control on a dry road
- Steering in the wet
- Control in the snow
- Control on ice
- Drive comfort
- Course stability
- Quiet in motion
- Braking efficiency
- Resistant to aquaplaning
- Velocity characteristics
- Wearability
- Quality of production
- Price justifiability