Tyre reviews Nokian Hakka Z. Page 3 1355

Nokian Hakka Z 235/55 R17 is really comfortable, soft and quiet. Previously, I had Bridgestone Dueler 215/65 R16 - for fishing and hunting. For the city and highway, Nokian is a good choice. Moreover, fuel consumption is even slightly lower with Nokian.

I drive a ML 350 without run-flat tires, with a 255/50/19 size. Michelin Diamaris 4+4 was fitted before. I was hesitant about Nokian, not being such a well-known brand as Michelin, Bridgestone, etc. But I installed them and I don't regret it one bit. I don't get why people write about their hardness. It's a very comfortable and quiet tire, especially for urban driving. On the highway

A great tire - worth its money. The sizes were a bit limited, so I had to buy a slightly larger one, but it was worth it, it's softer and more comfortable. Overall, the tire behaves stably and confidently, it won't give you a lot of power, but it will ride smoothly for a long time and won't hydroplane, it even brakes better on wet roads than on dry ones, it loves the road irregularities - now I don't notice them, it

No major defaults. Rigidity is a good tire for our cars a bit heavy, healthy behavior in all circumstances except snow. Good surprise, and the quality/price ratio is very good. A bit noisy, but less than the good year (HP All Weather) of origin.

Much better dry grip than the Michelin Exaltos - didn't chew up the tires or 'tramline' from traction control when pulling out on a fast mountain road which used to be the norm if feathering the throttle. Snow grip is better than you might expect from an all-season tire, and much better than the beastly Exaltos. MPG dropped by 1-2 miles per gallon. Tire noise is very noticeable when maneuvering at very low speed, but very quiet at speed

I bought it in the spring and have already driven about 50,000 km on it. The tires have shown themselves to be very good throughout the time, except for some moments. But in the rain, steering is a pleasure, it's very resistant to aquaplaning, cuts through puddles and you pass through them almost without noticing. On the highway, it holds very well, but the bridge joints are also felt well.... not pleasant.

In general, I

There's a feeling of a charged car!!!!

It hums a bit, louder than Kumho Solus KH15 or Dunlop SP Winter Sport M3. However, there's a feeling of a charged car!!!! It reacts very well to the gas and brake!!! The smoothness of the ride has increased significantly, and the jerks (when releasing the accelerator pedal) have disappeared. Continental hums much louder. In principle, I'm satisfied so far... No problems with balancing (

Great, especially for the price!

1. The tires are very hard, and since my car has a very stiff suspension, sometimes it feels like you're riding a train - that's how much the bumps on the asphalt or potholes are felt. The previous Michelin Energy was much softer.

Very pleased, reliable - safe

I consider safety to be the main thing, so moderate hum when driving is not a matter of principle, although a friend on Grandis (Mitsuk) does not notice any noise at all. The only thing on the dirt (it was correctly noted here) I think is a bit tricky, but I have ESP, and it's supposed to be driven into the mud with 4 * 4. In short, I'm very pleased! And

Super
After BRIDGESTONE, both handling and smoothness are better. On rain and in autumn - just super, haven't changed to winter tires yet.
Pros: ride smoothness, price/quality ratio